| Proposed redesign of the User Management module; possibly make Permissions Management module. | Maura | Patty asked if UM-SIG should take on the User Permissions Management – New User Interface Proposal. Bjorn said they have created a report Maura noted that it would be easier to transfer tasks in UM to another if the UI was simpler. 5 Colleges, TAMU, have a limited number of persons creating the permission sets and others assigning sets. Cornell has 2 right now doing both and they are creating a security group to look at permission management. Bjorn – they have 3 people doing permission management. Thinks this is a good proposal but from a local perspective this isn’t a high priority. Patty thinks we should invite those people who create permission sets to a set of meetings to create use cases and get input. https://issues.folio.org/browse/UXPROD-3159 Post in all SIG channels that the UM-SIG is going to work on the proposal and are asking for people who are actively working on permission management. Maura suggested we set a target for working on it of February
|
| Give feedback on UXPROD-3397. (Add accurate counts to patron group settings page and make counts in UI estimates) | Patty | The problem: User counts are unreliable if they are over 1,000. This might have something to do with the count function in the Users Module Settings. Is the count UI only? It is just an API query. One possible solution: Make the search asynchronous, which would not block the loading of the page. Columns would fill in as they could - no "Loading" indicator until the whole query is finished. "Lazy loading" - load a certain number of records, click a button to retrieve more records. Elastic Search does this, but our use cases don't need the time/resource usage.
Fun activity: Try searching by Quick Note.
|