2023-03-14 Discovery Integration Subgroup Meeting notes
- Uwe Reh
- Laura Schlett
Date
EDT 10:00 am to 11:00 am
Goals
Discussion items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10:00 | Start of the meeting:
| ||
| 10:05 - 10:45 | Future of the group | We should have 2 new goals: 1: getting everything discussed into code 2: should we go on as a subgroup or more as support group for Kallilah as a PO? Khalilah Gambrell : Maybe a combination of the two Funcitons of the Group: Sharing Knowledge/helping to prioritize and talk about issues/group needs clarification with/from POs. Uwe Reh We collected a lot of details. Question: What do we do with the collection? Could stories to discuss the new specs revised patron and rtac api be provided? Stories do not have an update yet. At earliest in 2 Weeks Normal way of proceeding would be : Having stories - estimate time - start to programm? Afraid that we are doing valuable but unused work. Would prototyping be an option instead of discussing the project in a whole, as we are facing the risk of defining without productive outcome. Does the group share the view: Bernd Oberknapp identify items that could be moved forward without defining the whole project. (low hanging fruit)→ these should be moved forward. kristin.olofsson : Leave it after prioritization and identification, then leave it to the community. Uwe Reh : Could this group be a parnert to the programmers: could we do reviews for the development. Making Tickets more precice? Demian Katz : What is the right rythm for things to happen. Where do we fit in. In which frequency. No preassure but be able to assist. Can we do things more async? Is it possible to work through slack and meet on demand. Should we suspend for a bit. Nicole Trujillo : What is relevant information for an outsider: how can they see what is identified. How to follow along with the process. Is it through linked tickets? Khalilah Gambrell The group highlights the most important issues. And finds requirements. If issues are super important that havent been discussed add them to the list or create a story in the support channel. Nicole Trujillo : The main goal of the group: Prioritize issues. Laura Schlett : Ranking the issues we identified as low hanging fruits. Should this happen via discussion? Uwe Reh : We could start a new table? Or just a new column? Go via comment or discuss Uwe Reh : Gonna add the new column (thank you Khalilah Gambrell : Agrees that a reprioritication would be helpfull when balancing between feasibility and importance. | |
Summary |
| ||
| Next meeting (two weekly) | |||
| 10:50 | End of the meeting |
) Everyone can add to rtac and user interface as the see fit.