2018-05-24 - System Operations and Management SIG Agenda and Notes
Date
Attendees
Goals
Discussion Items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
5 | Welcome | Ingolf |
|
10 | Organizational | Ingolf |
We can create issues at every level, Cate and Jakub will prioritize and assign. But the work of turning app ideas or epics into features and user stories is typically the work of a product owner. The role of the product owner is to coordinate this work. It could be distributed, but is that desirable? If distributed, JIRA story authors will need to advocate with Cate and Jakub and follow through on tickets. Proposal: SIG members create tickets, communication with technical/PO team facilitated by PO. Truth of the matter is a PO will not be assigned quickly. Proposal to ask for a PO now, but proceed with distributed model while one is assigned. Dale registered a strong objection to a product owner out of concern that introducing an extra layer will impede needed conversations between the SysOps team and developers. Voted: in favor of bringing the request for a product owner to the product council. Future agenda item: working with JIRA |
5 | Identifiers on Discuss | Tod | I've posted a thought piece on Discuss to start a conversation about identifiers: |
5 | Ticketing System | Ingolf | Shall we bring Ticketing System idea by Schwill, Carsten to the PC / Cate / Harry ? Same question for LS Tools . – connected to PO proposal Tabled for lack of time |
5 | JIRA Tickets | Ingolf | Open JIRA Tickets realted to SysOps issues – connected to PO proposal Tabled for lack of time |
next week holiday for Ingolf (Corpus Christi), Dale will convene. |