2018-08-31 Meeting notes
Date
Aug 31, 2018
Attendees
@Kristin Martin
@Kirstin Kemner-Heek
@Peter McCracken
@Bethany Greene (Deactivated)
@Kristen Wilson
@Virginia Martin
@Björn Muschall
@Martina Schildt
@Ann-Marie Breaux (Deactivated)
Ann Crowley
@Kathleen McEvoy (Deactivated)
@Ian Ibbotson (Use this one)
@Tim Whisenant
@Dennis Bridges
@Kelsey Brett
@Martina Tumulla
@Nicole Trujillo
@Owen Stephens
@Dan Huang
Discussion items
Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|
Minute taker | @Bethany Greene (Deactivated) |
|
ERM Update
| @Kirstin Kemner-Heek |
|
Announcements/PC Updates
| @Kristin Martin and @Dennis Bridges |
|
Current State of Batch Loading | @Ann-Marie Breaux (Deactivated) |
|
FOLIO Data Migration Subgroup Survey
| @Kristin Martin |
|
Re: the ERM/KB conversation, and harvesting the whole KB versus one library's holdings: I totally understand that the ERM has a tight timeline and a model that is being driven by the German libraries who will be using it with GoKB. At some point, it would be good to understand what a workflow might look like for early adopter libraries who use commercial KBs (mainly PQ and EBSCO, I guess, but maybe OCLC?), and will also have access to the tools within the ERM and eHoldings app. Between licenses, packages, eUsage, eHoldings, linking to orders, linking to vendors, etc - can that be pulled together into a workflow that is useful for those libraries? Since that is beyond the scope of the ERM group, maybe we could have a further conversation about it at an upcoming RM SIG meeting? Or maybe this is not a pressing issue for the early adopter libraries, so not necessary to discuss at this time. If that's the case, maybe we just acknowledge and document that and move on. In any event, thanks for considering.