2019-4-4 Resource Access Meeting Notes
Date
Apr 4, 2019
Attendees
Andrea Loigman
Charlotte Whitt
Emma Boettcher
Deb Lamb
Joanne Leary
David Bottorff
Cheryl Malmborg
Mark Canney
Susan Kimball
Cate Boerema (Deactivated)
Kimie Kester
Katharina Haas
Magda Zacharska (Deactivated)
Sharon Wiles-Young
lisa perchermeier
Jana Freytag
Kai Sprenger
William Weare
Mary Yokubaitis
Discussion tems
Time | Item | Who | Description | Goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
5min | Housekeeping | Andrea Loigman |
| Update on Off site storage development work and it is happening, Cate is handling this |
30min | Call numbers | Emma Boettcher and Charlotte Whitt | Display inconsistencies (con't from 3/28) | --clear explanation of enumeration, chronology, volume, and year, caption (from Charlotte Whitt) - slide deck: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Z3Ce8BiesdXriZwpcs0hRaIYBUKtEL9G28ItBXPH5eI/edit#slide=id.p Enumeration - v. no.1 descriptive of serial item, Chronology; year, season, month can be expressed as a number as well Enum/Chronolgy- and can have only chronology Map inventory holdings to export holdings to other systems Monographs multi-part item can have year or volume information or both to describe item Implemented enumeration and chronology and Q2 to display concatenate both enumeration and chronology Item record: call number, volume, enumeration and copy Questions: Requests do we display item level data yes from the item record-Call number storage in holdings record - when temporary call number (reserve); do we have temporary location and permanent location for both item and holdings --can temporary and permanent call numbers be edited on both the item and holdings level Call number subgroup : need volunteers to work with Charlotte and Emma–David Bottorff, Susan and Andrea
Continued: call number fields (from Charlotte Whitt) - slide deck: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/152x27epGqEWxSUKSew8pK0lkWxB9ueNtZqFdMJqpARM/edit#slide=id.p |
25min | Recently returned | Emma Boettcher | Trigger actions | decisions on what triggers the flip from recently returned to available & how that is scheduled Recently returned: switch from recently returned and then shelving lag time then change to available; when does timer start for recently return item at first scan or second scan; concern will the system have to scan for recently returned all day or should it be an overnight batch job- similar functionality for hold shelf expiration Cate will find out about this functionality–concerns about system performance if in "real time" Recently returned timing- what increments hour/less hour–batch job is fine for some institutions–questions about reserves items have different increments for recently returned- no need to hold up development for this feature but we should add a JIRA for this feature to be done at some point Setting for batch job to be done and change status–different lag times for different service points-Use case - check in bindery materials and change to recently returned and bindery materials not shelved and checked in second time maybe a workflow status or location could solve this QUESTION service points or locations to use in lag time for recently returned? Question: do we need a report or in app report to examine recently returned–should be a report for statuses
|
Meeting Outcomes
Functional Area | Product Owner | Planned Release (if known) | Decision Reached | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
e.g. loans, fees/fines | Name | e.g. Q4 2018, Q1 2019 | Clearly stated decision |
|
Loans | Emma Boettcher |
| Recently returned → available is established relative to the time of scan, not the time of status becoming recently returned |
|
|
|
|
|
|