2023-07-13 Product Council Meeting Notes

2023-07-13 Product Council Meeting Notes

Date

Jul 13, 2023 

Attendees

  • @Alexis Manheim, @Charlotte Whitt @Carol Sterenberg @Gang Zhou @Jesse Koennecke @Tara Barnett @Martina Tumulla @Paul Moeller @Aaron Trehub@Brooks Travis @Tod Olson @Ann DP @Owen Stephens @Jennifer Eustis @Peter Murray @Anya @Hkaplanian @Lisa McColl @Christopher Spalding 

  • Note taker: @Martina Schildt, Charlotte Whitt, Jennifer Eustis, Owen Stephens

Discussion items

Time

Item

Who

Notes

Time

Item

Who

Notes

5 min

Announcements

All @

Group meeting on Monday, 7/17 to complete the Dev Advocate proposal. Any last minute comments by the end of the day.

  • proposal goes back to CC on Jul 24, 2023 

Watch the video on updated TCR process.

  • may generally be a good way to share information with the Community in the future

Anya in chat: Oakland University (Michigan) went live on full FOLIO on July 5th - I believe they are the first Alma library to complete their migration to FOLIO in the USA.

Agenda for WOLFcon 2023 is available: https://wolfcon2023.sched.com/

LC has officially joined the FOLIO Community.

15 min

SIG updates and Liaisons 

Clarification of responsibilities

@Alexis Manheim All

PC members should have done this before the meeting today. Any gaps?

  • Subgroups of MM will be covered by @Charlotte Whitt and @Jennifer Eustis as MM liaisons 

  • tbd We need a PC liaison for Privacy, the group is moderately active 

  • We need a PC liaison for Open Access → @Owen Stephens will take over this role

  • What is the responsibility of PC liaisons

    • being the contact between the SIG/Council and PC

    • if something comes up in a SIG, that needs discussion in PC, the liaison will raise it in a PC meeting

    • concerns from the PC will be communicated to the SIG

    • as an option: liaison could give a summary of PC meetings - some write reports once a month

    • facilitate awareness

Future topic we need to differentiate between the roles of SIG convener (who gives reports to the PC once a month) and the PC liaison

10 min

Release Planning Stakeholders meeting update

@Jennifer Eustis 

Two issues were approved for the Orchid Critical Service Patch 3:

This issue has been pushed out and excluded from the Nolana CSP 2:

  • https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/MODSOURCE-659

  • Why is it pushed? → Harry: it is in testing and not ready - it needs more work and there is a workaround existing

  • what is the relase process?

    • POs raise awareness for bugs that need fixing and give information on testing period, when fix will be ready etc. 

    • the fix will be approved as a critical service patch

    • then a date will be set for the patch to be released

  • Owen in chat: The last update from Oleksii to product owners on this was:
    I just want to remind you that for post release delivery we are using Critical Service Patch process - Critical Service Patch Process Our upcoming Patches are for Nolana and Orchid: Orchid (R1 2023) Service Patch #3 and Nolana (R3 2022) Service Patch #2. No particular dates for each Service Patch - just release after each sprint.

  • Harry: Ideally, no service patches are needed; but bugs cannot always be caught in testing

  • sometimes security issues can only become apparent after a release

  • Jennifer in chat: These can also be disruptive to libraries especially after upgrading

  • the new release process needs reviewing as well

  • question by Charlotte in chat: Who will be responsible for the review of the CSP process: RMS/CC/PC?

    • who will initiate it?

    • Harry: this is ongoing and done by developers - but needs time

    • Alexis: RMS should bring in whoever will be needed for evaluation

Critical Service Patch Dashboards:

There is a new and open Slack channel for Release Management Stakeholder

Question: when will the Critical service patches be released? → This information should be part of the CSP Dashboards

 

5-10 min

Managing AWS costs TC subgroup

@Tod Olson 

Technical Council has drafted some new procedures for managing our ongoing AWS costs, after a request from Community Council.  CC has a necessary role in the process and I just asked them to weigh in.  PC should be aware of the new oversight group we're proposing and comments there about PC.

  • some more oversight on AWS is desired and needed

  • AWS Cost Review Group - page is in progress by a subgroup

    • not a lot of changes are expected

    • waits for approval by CC - initial reactions were positive - deadline for feedback/approval Jul 24, 2023 

  • Responsibilities:

  • the 3 members are representing Kitfox (Yogesh Kumar , FOLIO QA coordinator and Kitfox PO), CC (TBD) and TC (Peter Murray)

  • Peter has been monitoring AWS costs / budgets for years now

  • Alexis: PC is invited to participate, but participation is optional

  • Charlotte: how is the expensiveness of the code calculated - via number of transactions?

    • That would help us think about how we can create the code to be less expensive

    • Peter: transactions should not have that much impact - no significant factor

    • good to have a group of people that is looking after aws costs now (more minds = more experience)

  • any open wishes or questions by PC - are we fine with our role?

  • feedback from PC: sounds all good

20 min

Planning for what PC needs to cover at WOLFcon

Spreadsheet with sessions and Council meeting topics

 

@Alexis Manheim All

Sched is up

  • Councils will meet on Friday, after the WOLFcon

  • there will be individual Council meetings and tri-council meetings

  • Topics proposed in the PC call:

    • Roadmap and future prioritization

    • Plan for what PC will be focussing on over next 18 months

  • the discusison will be continued in next weeks until WOLFcon

  • ideas can be added any time to the document

5 min

Future topics

 

Support SIG, issues/bugs that need attention

Release Planning Stakeholder's review of Critical Service Patch process (after Poppy release)

No meeting next week Jul 20, 2023 

Action items