Prokopovych Disband plan

Owned by Khalilah Gambrell
Last updated: Aug 01, 2022 by Marc Johnson
2 min read
  • Timeline 
    • What is the proposed timeline to complete? 
      • Tentative: August 22nd (MG release - public) 
      • Need to inform developers, etc. 
  • Team - Recommendations on where team members should be assigned 
    • BE: TAMU (dev) [MJ's recommendation: core-platform] , Kyle (GVSU) [Vega with focus patron/rtac?]
    • FE: Michal (recommend Sif to focus on boundwidths for Nolana/Orchid but will continue to work on stripes related.) 
      • Address boundwidths 
      • Address ui-inventory/ui-users issues 
    • Dev lead:  MarcJ - TBD 
    • POs: Charlotte/Patty/KG - 
  • Is there a list of backlog of user stories/defects
  • Is there a list of features 
  • Any critical features/work needed or underway? 
  • What is the availability of Charlotte and Marc to help teams with knowledge sharing [MarcJ will allocate time.]
  • Morning Glory hotfix handling - Can Prokopovych development be available to address hotfix issues?  [MarcJ will allocate time.]
  • A list of Proposed Nolana features (Inventory) - Prokopovych:
  • A list of Proposed Nolana features (non-Inventory) - Prokopovych:
  • Nolana release support: Should we consider that current team members are responsible or help with releasing modules? [MarcJ will allocate time.]
  • Test cases reassignment
  • RTL/JEST
  • Karate
  • e2e 
Backend modulesThoughts regarding on team to reassign 
mod-usersVery few recent changes.  Core-platform / Thor? Most recent changes made by Julian and ID folks.
mod-users-bl

Should likely go with mod-users, assuming we want vertical alignment (without, more coordination is needed).

Much recent development is being made by Steve in the Core Platform team relating to login. I don't know if Steve might be moving teams. He is also likely to make more changes relating to shrinking the minimal platform.

(arguably should eventually be merged with mod-users now folks don't seem to support the storage / business logic split anymore)

mod-inventory

Has responsibilities that cross boundaries: inventory and data import.

Data import makes up much of the code of the module and is a primary reason for change. This would suggest Folijet.

mod-inventory-storage

Could go with mod-inventory (to keep vertical alignment), although this is hard due to the responsibilities 

Otherwise, probably Core Platform as they made most of the recent changes.

mod-rtac/edge-rtac

EBSCO built these and were only recently inherited by Prokopovych.

Vega?

mod-patron/edge-patron

EBSCO built these and were only recently inherited by Prokopovych.

Vega?

mod-codex-inventory

Should go with mod-inventory-storage.

(Might be worth proposing deprecation, I don't know if Codex is used anymore)

Frontend modulesThoughts regarding on team to reassign 
ui-users

no obvious choices - Anna Melnyk worked on this and ui-inventory a bit. She is part of Vega

There is value in keeping these in a vertical with the back end, however that might be hard to achieve

The features in this module are somewhat split, it allows for searching and editing users, which is aligned with mod-users, however the presentation of permissions, loans, requests etc are all aligned with other teams

ui-inventory

no obvious choices, maybe Thor / SIF due to bound-withs etc. Anna Melnyk worked on both this and ui-users a bit. She is part of Vega

There is value in keeping these in a vertical with the back end, however that might be hard to achieve.

The features in this module are somewhat split between teams as it stands. Search is mostly dependent upon Spitfire (for mod-search), viewing and editing is Prokopovych and QuickMarc is another team

ui-plugin-create-inventory-recordsShould go with ui-inventory.
ui-service-pointsThis crosses boundaries again. Service points are implemented in inventory, and related to locations and users.