2026-05-21 Product Council Agenda and Minutes

2026-05-21 Product Council Agenda and Minutes

 Date

May 21, 2026

 Participants

  • PC Members: @Caitlin Stewart @Thomas Trutt @Alexis Manheim @Tod Olson@Jennifer Eustis @Lisa McColl @Autumn Faulkner @Jeremy Huff @Martin Scholz

  • Other Attendees: @Gang Zhou

  • Regrets: @Charlotte Whitt@Jana Freytag

  • Note taker: @Autumn Faulkner

Highlights for Monthly Newsletter

 Discussion topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

5 - 10 min

Welcome & Announcements

Jennifer

  • WolfCon 2026

    • Pre-conference sessions posted

    • Require separate registration and are in-person only (Prague)

    • ~100+ submissions received

    • Agenda expected mid–late June

    • Registration codes being distributed (contact Jennifer if needed)

  • Calendar Calming Week

    • Next week: no PC or planning meetings

    • Many working groups also on hiatus

5 min

Liaison updates

 

CC: No meeting this week

TC: Some continued discussion of some deployment configuration standards; no special topic discussion.

RMS: No meeting this week.

Housekeeping

10 - 15 Min

Introduce New Decision Logging Approach

@Jeremy Huff @Caitlin Stewart

Change in approach

  • Moving from manual decision logging → automated via Confluence

  • Note-taking template will include a decision macro

  • Decisions entered in meeting notes will auto-populate decision log

Agreements

  • Add standing agenda item to capture:

    • Asynchronous (Slack) decisions

  • Record async decisions in next meeting notes to ensure inclusion in log

Updates on Active Initiatives

5 min

Review Working Group Update Schedule

@Jeremy Huff

Better Sample Data

  • Ongoing work; no major updates

  • Next PC update: July (mid–late)

Community Priorities Dashboard

  • Preparing to request updated priorities from SIGs

  • Timeline:

    • Documentation feedback → early June

    • Call to SIGs → mid-June

    • SIG updates → ~1 month

  • Goal: readiness before WolfCon

Release Management & Communication

  • Next step:

    • Present proposal to Community Council

  • Scheduling challenges getting on CC agenda

  • Next PC update: early July (likely July 9)

New Topics

10 - 15 min

Review of SIG Liaison Responsibilities

All

Current Issues Identified

  • Documentation is outdated

    • References roadmap (no longer central)

    • References monthly reports (no longer standard)

  • Responsibilities are unclear or unrealistic

    • “Health checks” undefined

    • PC cannot allocate developer resources

  • Workload imbalance

    • SIG conveners and PC members both overloaded

    • Liaisons often unable to fulfill expectations fully

  • Onboarding gap

    • New PC members lack clarity on liaison role

  • Process drift

    • Significant gap between documented responsibilities and actual practice

  • Need to reduce SIG overhead, which includes:

    • Prioritization work (especially in Jira)

    • SIG reports

    • Repetitive documentation tasks

    • Work prepared for development that never happens

  • Expectation mismatch

    • Community expectations exceed what PC can control (especially resources)

  • Communication gaps

    • Need clearer messaging on what PC can/cannot do

    • Purpose of prioritization, distinction between that and SIG reports

Key Takeaways

  • Liaison role remains valuable but needs:

    • Updated scope

    • Alignment with current processes (e.g., priorities dashboard)

  • Consider:

    • Delegating liaison responsibilities beyond PC members

  • Need to reassess expectations for both:

    • Liaisons AND SIG conveners

Discussion Highlights

SIG priorities & dashboard

  • Value in having a compilation of the community’s most important issues

    • Informative for POs, implementers, etc.

    • Creates a central high-level view of the project not easily available elsewhere

  • Expected to become easier to populate and maintain over time

  • Possibilities for expansion:

    • Guidance for development contributions

    • Potential funding targeting

    • Building investment narratives

  • Consensus: keep and support

SIG Reports

  • Value unclear

  • May duplicate other communication channels

  • Action needed: evaluate continuation vs elimination

Major Concern

  • SIGs produce work that:

    • Is not developed

    • Must later be redone

  • Result:

    • Frustration and burnout

10 - 15 min

Community Directed Development Framework MV DIP

@Jeremy Huff

There wasn’t much time for this discussion after the previous topic. Brief comments included:

  • The nature of the envisioned DIP doesn’t lend itself well to a minimally viable version

  • Is it clear what problem the DIP is intended to solve?

  • Some concern that it recreates a development process we already sort of have in place

  • Meanwhile, a clear problem is a mismatch between community expectations and what PC, TC, etc., are capable of doing re: development

Planning

5 min

Newsletter topics

 

-

10 min

Define agendas for next 2 meetings

 

 

 Related materials


📄 Meeting Minutes: