2025-12-04 Product Council Agenda and Meeting Notes
Date
Dec 4, 2025
Participants
PC Members: @Autumn Faulkner @Tod Olson @Lisa McColl @Alexis Manheim @Thomas Trutt @Charlotte Whitt @Jennifer Eustis @Jana Freytag @Caitlin Stewart
Other Attendees: @Jaleh Fazelian @Mark Veksler
Regrets: @Jeremy Huff @Martin Scholz
Note taker: @Autumn Faulkner
Highlights for Monthly Newsletter
The Product Council has approved the three working group charters for the groups created to advance their annual goals
Discussion topics
Time | Item | Presenter | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
5 min | Welcome & Announcements | @Jeremy Huff |
|
Housekeeping | |||
3 - 5 min | Liaison Updates | @Tod Olson , @Alexis Manheim , @Jennifer Eustis | Qulto Monguz new FOLIO contributing member (Hungarian vendor) Continued discussion on value of membership. Looked more closely at the 3 most voted for items of the list of 14. Three that got the most votes were Development priority influence (needs structure and resources behind it), Technical expertise access (One-on-one access to community experts for specific technical questions, could be around subject matter expertise, functional expertise, or technical expertise) and Training materials and resources. Open items for Councils from WOLFcon. Nine listed, two belong to the PC (1. Work on visibility of development requests / DIP proposal and 2. Create updated list of FOLIO modules with maintenance status (including orphaned apps). Reports on all of these will be presented at the next tri-council meeting (to be scheduled for sometime in mid-January.)
RMS: Ramsons CSP 9 might be delayed to early January. More information to come. The group is currently working on the roadmap dates for Trillium and the spring calendar. |
3 - 5 min | Action Item Review | @Jeremy Huff | Tabled |
3 - 5 min | Calendar Calming Proposal | @Charlotte Whitt @Alexis Manheim |
|
Updates on Active Initiatives | |||
5 - 10 min | Working Group Check-in | All |
|
New Topics | |||
5 - 10 min | Support SIG Presentation | @Jaleh Fazelian |
|
10 - 15 min | Working Group Charter Review: RMS/PC Roles, Relations and Communication | @Autumn Faulkner | There have been good discussions about the scope of the working group. The primary focus is how RMS drives priorities and timetables. As we learn more in our environmental scan, we’ll propose recommendations for governance, hierarchy, and communication. We want to document how things are happening now, make recommendations and updates to charters and process, and improve communication. For translating UXPRODs into real life functionality, on the dashboard, it is just tickets. What does this mean in terms of functionality? How is this going to help? What is the real life functionality that these issues bring to FOLIO as a product? Is there a need for a technical writer? Yes there is a lot of documentation. Could we recommend new roles if those help with communication and documentation? As we are thinking of each new release, we may want to think of permanent roles. We need to think of the skills needed for these roles. We could have technical writer to write up the digest in a human readable manner. There could also be a QA lead who could rally people to test. |
Planning | |||
5 min | Newsletter topics | All |
|
10 min | Define agendas for next 2 meetings | All |
|
Action Items
Decisions
Related materials
Recording: