2020-07-30 Metadata Management Meeting notes

Remote Storage Integration Small Group

@Cate Boerema (Deactivated)

With @Anastasiia Zakharova(Stacy) putting together a small group on the topic of remote storage. Looking for Subject Matter Specialists to join the group. Feel free to go directly to the new wiki page <Remote storage integration subgroup> Please put on the page your area of expertise. Feel free to contact @Anastasiia Zakharova on Slack with any questions you have.

Subgroup & other updates/announcements?

No announcements

Bound-with Subgroup update (continued from 2020-07-23)

@Laura E Daniels @Jessica Janecki @Felix Hemme @Natascha Owens

Slides

Proposing a change to the data model that will allow one item to be associated with more than one holdings record.

Continued beginning on Slide 19 of slide deck linked above.

End of day August 5th, please contact Charlotte, Felix,  Natascha or Jessica with concerns.

Notes from chat:

From Ann Kardos (she/her) to Everyone: 12:26 PM
Why can’t we just say “The title you requested is included in a volume with these titles: list of titles"
From Felicia Piscitelli to Everyone: 12:27 PM
In the case of special collections, the request would be mediated through a public-service person, who can communicate the fact that there are other titles
From scolglaz@mtholyoke.edu to Everyone: 12:27 PM
I like what Ann suggested
From Ann Kardos (she/her) to Everyone: 12:30 PM
I don’t find it that mysterious either, and at some point there may be a public service person mediating this So I think something simple just describing that the piece someone wants is included with other titles is sufficient.
From Felicia Piscitelli to Everyone: 12:30 PM
"Bound-with" is more specific than "With". You can have something "With" accompanying material that is not bound
From Jacquie Samples to Everyone: 12:31 PM
I agree Felicia, but on that point, wouldn't these also circulate together? That word would then serve more than one purpose.
From Felicia Piscitelli to Everyone: 12:33 PM
Well, in MARC the 501 "With" note is more specific, meaning issued that way by the publisher or printer, as opposed to several titles bound together after publication
From Jacquie Samples to Everyone: 12:33 PM
Also, thinking of "filmed with" I think that the note should only include the first title.
From Felicia Piscitelli to Everyone: 12:38 PM
I think Having an item record connect to multiple holdings will be helpful. If you leke, I can send you some really tricky examples from our catalog
From Laura Wright (she/her) to Everyone: 12:39 PM
Sure, that would be great

Further discussion on migration of bound-withs to Folio.

Future MM meetings (ongoing)

Add ideas here

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1u1tvfVxn6i3fTImrWWCYHlh7RT5cf3_G7YgDuxKob4M/edit

Aaron Trehub

Auburn

Ann-Marie Breaux

EBSCO

Ann Kardos

UMass Amherst

@Charlotte Whitt

Index Data

Christie Thomas

Chicago

    x

Christin Seegert

hbz

Colin Van Alstine

Smith (FC)

Damian Biagi

Dennis Bridges

Stacks

Dennis Christman

Duke University

Douglas Chorpita

Goethe Uni Frankfurt

Dracine Hodges

Duke University

Felix Hemme

ZBW

Filip Jakobsen

Jacquie Samples

Duke University

Jason Kovari

Cornell

Jenn Colt

Cornell

Jennifer Eustis

UMass Amherst

Jessica Janecki

Duke University

Kristen Wilson

Index Data

Laura Wright

Cornell

Lisa Furubotten

Texas A&M

Lisa McColl

Lehigh University

Lisa Sjögren

Chalmers

Lynn Whittenberger

Magda Zacharska

EBSCO

Martina Schildt

VZG

Nancy Lorimer

Stanford

Natascha Owens

Chicago

Niels Erik Nielsen

Patty Wanninger

EBSCO

Rita Albrecht

HeBIS-Verbundzentrale

Sara Colglazier

MHC/5C

Tiziana Possemato

Theodor Tolstoy

EBSCO

Wayne Schneider

Index Data