2025-09-04 Metadata Management Meeting notes
Meeting URL: Join our Cloud HD Video Meeting . The meeting password can be found here.
Date
Sep 4, 2025
Note taker
Katie Rahman
Recordings
https://recordings.openlibraryfoundation.org/folio/metadata-management-sig/
Discussion items
Item | Presenter | Notes |
|---|---|---|
Announcements | There are no announcements. | |
Brainstorm and collect topic ideas for our working meeting session at WOLFcon 2025 | @Felix Hemme and the SIG | Felix mentioned that during WOLFcon 2025 there will be one 50 minutes MM SIG working session. Felix asked the group who will be present in person and plans to attend the MM SIG session. He also asked whether someone attending in person can check the room and start up the session. Laura mentioned that ideally someone attends in person, but if that is not possible, they have some volunteers to help on-site. We would need to reach out to Jesse or Jennifer regarding volunteers. Vivian, Katie, and Natascha will be attending on-site, and Felix will reach out to them after meeting with the planning committee. Q: How will the link for the meeting be shared with us? A: It will be shared in the agenda, and it will be listed under the session in sched. Laura mentioned that she has a scheduling conflict for the MM SIG session at WOLFcon, so we should not pick a topic that relies on her running the meeting. Felix: Because we have just 50 minutes, we should choose only one topic. Potential topics:
Charlotte: During the PC meeting, Christie Thomas and Jennifer Eustis presented on the top 5 priorities for the Data Import SIG. Christie mentioned that the original intention with Data Import was not that you would always have an underlying MARC record. However, the way FOLIO currently works is that if you import records, you will always have an underlying MARC record associated with your instance record. This fits into a discussion about the Inventory Data Model. Laura: This also fits into linked data issues. Currently, if you create an instance with an underlying MARC record, then you are stuck with the MARC record. At Cornell, they have discussed numerous use cases in which you would create an instance from a MARC record, but would not keep the underlying MARC source.
Charlotte: We should take the opportunity to have a face-to-face meeting during WOLFcon to discuss topics on our priority list. I agree that the hierarchical display is important because we only get the instance record. We should work on this ticket to make it more dev ready.
Felix: If a large number of members are attending in person, it would be beneficial to discuss the hierarchical display, but if most members are online, we should focus on what we would really like to achieve. Laura: Q: Felix, are you proposing a broader review of the user interface for an inventory outline - what is working, what is not working, and what we would like to see? A: Yes, at least as the results list is concerned. We would not focus on searching and filtering. Charlotte: In past discussions, some members prefer the multi-column list display, and others prefer the more visual presentation as Philip Jacobson suggested. For now, we can discuss which data elements we would like to have presented. Maybe, the content is, right now, more interesting to discuss, and then we can leave the more visual presentation for a later talk. Sara: There needs to be a better way to browse holdings and item records. This is especially an issue for staff who deal with serials and periodicals because there are holding records with thousands of items. The instance record is too dominant. Maybe, the reason the hierarchical view has been around for a while and has not gone anywhere is that, in part, it doesn’t actually give us what we really need and want. The functionality for browse view (e.g., subject searching, call number searching) is a roundabout way to get at what we actually need and want. Therefore, we should think about what is it that we really need. Felix: Yes, this should be explored in light of what other apps are doing, such as the Agreements app. With the Agreements app, the view is just focused on the entity you are searching for. The MM SIG agreed on the topic of the UI in Inventory for WOLFcon meeting. Felix and Raegan will contact product owners regarding joining including Ryan, Christine, and Khalilah. (Khalilah may have a scheduling conflict). Felix will create a dedicated agenda page for the working meeting. |
@Felix Hemme | Because of a Slack message he saw last week, Felix has been in touch with Martina and Julian regarding how we can move this ticket forward. The current status is draft, and it is not complete. We should change it, so POs are more open to pick up the work. We need to update the ticket description to reflect the changes the MM SIG has agreed on: Remove leading and trailing whitespace and ignore double spaces inside field values for the time being. Felix proposed to split the ticket to provide a minimal viable product. 1 new MVP feature:
1 new feature that handles the correction in existing Inventory records:
1 new backend feature for long-term solution:
Comments Sara: This is also in the Cross-App priority list. Felix: Regarding the Cross-App case UXPROD-4546, this is a more general ticket for all apps across FOLIO, not just focused on the Inventory app. Also, the MM SIG agreed there are some use cases for double spaces. Therefore, we all agreed on leading and trailing spaces. Concerns Vivian: There are probably going to be places where more than one space is appropriate in the data or intended in the data. As long as there is some way to search for data strings that do contain extra spaces, then I don’t have any issues with anything that strips those extra spaces. CQL queries are already taking out extra spaces and that is concerning. Because we are not only stripping extra spaces for our default searches, we are also not providing away to search for data with these spaces. Possible Solutions for searching for elements with whitepaces Vivian: One solution is to make all default searching strip out the spaces, but we allow the CQL search to continue to define a search where we can define multiple spaces and not have those automatically reduced to a single space. Charlotte: For cases in which we want to search for items with whitespaces, maybe, there can be advanced search option. Laura: This reminds me of our discussion about searching MARC and the need for more robust reporting. Not all libraries have access to a reporting tool such as Metadb. Felix: We should note that there should be a way for librarians to find these records if they do not have access to a reporting tool, such as Metadb. Sara: Are we going to discuss which elements? In certain fields, you might want to have two spaces. A: We could not come up with use cases that we want to save the leading and trailing spaces, so we thought it would be easier to say anything. It is only the whitespaces at the beginning and end of the element. It is not about line breaks. Felix will create a wiki page for the MM SIG where we can collect requirements and provide some examples. After the page is complete, he will share it via Slack. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Council updates | Charlotte Whitt | Link to Agenda: https://folio-org.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/PC/pages/1173749808/2025-09-4+Product+Council+Agenda+and+Minutes Discussed Data Import and ERM SIG Priorities. Trillium might be delayed. |
BELA (Bulk Edit and Lists App) | Jennifer Eustis | No meeting this week. |
Data Import SIG | Jennifer Eustis | No meeting this week. |
Chat
2025-09-04 10:34:10 From Laura Daniels to Everyone:
Felix, will you be attending virtually?
2025-09-04 10:34:23 From Felix Hemme to Everyone:
Yes
2025-09-04 10:34:36 From Laura Daniels to Everyone:
I will be attending virtually as well
2025-09-04 10:34:53 From Lloyd Chittenden to Everyone:
Virtual.
2025-09-04 10:34:55 From Charlotte Whitt to Everyone:
Same will I - only virtually
2025-09-04 10:34:57 From Natascha Owens (UChicago) to Everyone:
I'll be there in-person
2025-09-04 10:35:08 From Alissa Hafele to Everyone:
I will be there in person
2025-09-04 10:38:17 From Magda Gad to Everyone:
How will the link for the meeting be shared with us?
2025-09-04 10:38:26 From Laura Daniels to Everyone:
I just realized I have a conflict at that time (personal, not another session)
2025-09-04 10:38:26 From Jenn Colt to Everyone:
I’ll be there in person too
2025-09-04 10:39:12 From Natascha Owens (UChicago) to Everyone:
I will be there...I can help check on things (just not sure how well I can trouble-shoot technical issues)!
Laura Daniels:🙏🏼
2025-09-04 10:40:06 From Laura Daniels to Everyone:
Replying to "I will be there...I can help check on things (just...":
the technical issues I remember having in the past were things like needing to turn the microphone on!
Natascha Owens (UChicago):👍
2025-09-04 10:40:25 From Magda Gad to Everyone:
Thanks Felix!
2025-09-04 10:42:36 From Laura Daniels to Everyone:
That also fits with Linked Data issues.
2025-09-04 10:43:11 From Nancy Lorimer to Everyone:
+1 with Laura. It is a problem we are grappling with.
2025-09-04 10:43:48 From Lynne Fors to Everyone:
Moving forward with the Heirarchical view of Inventory could be a topic: UXPROD-491: Result list. Long term solution. Implement Refined UX-design for Inventory - hierarchical navigation structure (Instance, Holdings, Item)Draft
Laura Daniels, Charlotte Whitt, Natascha Owens (UChicago), Robert Rendall:👍🏼
2025-09-04 10:45:00 From Vivian Gould to Everyone:
Okay, as it turns out, I am at the local information table all morning on Wednesday, I won't really be available and will also miss the meeting. :(
Laura Daniels, Felix Hemme:🙁
2025-09-04 10:45:31 From Lynne Fors to Everyone:
Replying to "Moving forward with the Heirarchical view of Inven...":
THis has been on the wishlist for a very long time
Charlotte Whitt:💯
2025-09-04 10:49:28 From Sara Colglazier (MHC/5C) to Everyone:
There needs to be a better way to browse Holdings records and esp. Item records, esp. when I am searching on those segments, I am doing so for a reason.
Ryan Tamares - Stanford Law Library, Jennifer Eustis:➕
Julie Darken, Robert Rendall:👍
2025-09-04 10:54:16 From Lynne Fors to Everyone:
➕
Ryan Tamares - Stanford Law Library, Alaina Economus (they/she), Natascha Owens (UChicago):➕
2025-09-04 10:54:26 From Lisa M English to Everyone:
yes
2025-09-04 10:54:29 From Katie Rahman to Everyone:
Yes
2025-09-04 10:55:06 From Jenn Colt to Everyone:
Khalilah’s got a conflicting session it looks like
2025-09-04 10:57:52 From Sara Colglazier (MHC/5C) to Everyone:
Isn't there something like this also on the priority list for cross app?
2025-09-04 10:58:49 From Sara Colglazier (MHC/5C) to Everyone:
It is a problem throughout FOLIO!
2025-09-04 11:00:08 From Lloyd Chittenden to Everyone:
Don't many LCCNs start with three spaces? Is it ok to remove them?
2025-09-04 11:00:32 From Laura Daniels to Everyone:
Replying to "Don't many LCCNs start with three spaces? Is it ok...":
I don't think anyone would search for them with the spaces
Lynne Fors:💯
2025-09-04 11:01:47 From Laura Daniels to Everyone:
Replying to "Don't many LCCNs start with three spaces? Is it ok...":
especially if they were not stored and were stripped out of search terms (which is what I believe we are asking for)
2025-09-04 11:04:08 From Lloyd Chittenden to Everyone:
Replying to "Don't many LCCNs start with three spaces? Is it ok...":
They should be ignored in searching, but I think they are officially part of the string, for some bizarre reason. I'll bet LC will want to keep them in their data.
2025-09-04 11:04:12 From Sara Colglazier (MHC/5C) to Everyone:
Will this require a re-indexing, or re-saving, for it to take affect for records that already exist when implemented?
2025-09-04 11:04:48 From Lynne Fors to Everyone:
Replying to "Don't many LCCNs start with three spaces? Is it ok...":
I think searching LCCN is normalized
2025-09-04 11:04:59 From Darby, Kristy L to Everyone:
Replying to "Don't many LCCNs start with three spaces? Is it ok...":
We (LC) do retain them as "official" but yes -- Lynne is right
2025-09-04 11:05:12 From Laura Daniels to Everyone:
Replying to "Will this require a re-indexing, or re-saving, for...":
any changes to how data are stored requires re-indexing for it to be applied to the existing data (that's my understanding at least)
2025-09-04 11:05:47 From Sara Colglazier (MHC/5C) to Everyone:
Replying to "Will this require a re-indexing, or re-saving, for...":
thanks
2025-09-04 11:15:49 From Laura Daniels to Everyone:
It means this ticket needs updating!
2025-09-04 11:16:32 From Sara Colglazier (MHC/5C) to Everyone:
OK, I guess I needed it stated. Sorry
2025-09-04 11:16:45 From Vivian Gould to Everyone:
To clarify: While there may be examples of data where the extra spaces are needed or desired, my primary concern is in retrieving data that DOES have the extra spaces. It seems that most of what has been displayed/discussed strips the extra space from searching so there is no way to retrieve the records that DO have the extra spaces.
2025-09-04 11:17:41 From Vivian Gould to Everyone:
In other words, if I am searching for a record with title "a b" and my search automatically removes the extra space, I will never retrieve the record.
2025-09-04 11:18:09 From Laura Daniels to Everyone:
I think we're talking about leading and trailing space and space-like characters only?
2025-09-04 11:22:39 From Lynne Fors to Everyone:
That kind of specific search I would use "[space][space][space]12345" with the quotes. LCCN index search is normalized where the white space is removed.
2025-09-04 11:23:30 From Vivian Gould to Everyone:
Thank you, Lynne. I chose the LCCN example because that was a real time example. But that is super helpful to know.
2025-09-04 11:30:22 From Jennifer Eustis to Everyone:
Product Council Topic Calendar 2025