Overview

This document contains the results of testing Check-in/Check-out and Data Import for MARC Bibliographic records in the Quesnelia release.

Ticket: PERF-824 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Summary

• Data import tests finished successfully for all files. Duration of DI grew in correspondence with the number of records in files.
• Check-in and Check-out with 8 virtual users was performed during DI Create and Update jobs. No issues.
• Data Import in Quesnelia with CICO perform faster than without it.
• Comparing Poppy and Quesnelia releases
  • Check-in / Check-out perform better in Quesnelia.  Response time improved during Create jobs - 30% in Average, and during DI Update jobs - 15% in Average.
  • DI durations do not differ much
• Resource utilization
  • Average CPU utilization did not exceed 150% for all modules. The highest consumption observed from mod-inventory - 144% in DI Update job with 25k file. The same maximum level as in Poppy. 
  • No memory leaks observed during tests.
  • Average DB CPU usage during data import has 5% decreasing in Quesnelia - close to 90%.
  • Average connection count during data import is about 750 connections for create jobs that is 450 connections higher than in Poppy. For update jobs - 730 connections.

Test Runs 

Test Results

Data import

Files for Data Import update jobs prepared during previous tests. So no need to run Data Export.

Check-in/Check-out without DI

Comparison

CICO