Overview

This document contains the results of testing Data Import for MARC Bibliographic records with an update job in the Quesnelia release on qcp1 environments with Kafka consolidated topics and file splitting features enabled on a non-ecs environment.

Summary

Data import tests finished successfully, only Test №5 had one failed record for Tenant 2(qcp1-01) when processed 50k files. Duration of DI grew in correspondence with the number of records in files.
Check-in and Check-out with 5 virtual users was performed during DI Create new MARC authority records jobs for non-matches No issues.
Data Import in Quesnelia without CICO perform faster than with it.
Comparing Poppy and Quesnelia releases
- Check-in / Check-out perform better in Quesnelia. Response time improved during Create jobs for long period of work time on 15% in Average.
- DI durations improved - 11%-14% in Average.
During testing, we noticed spikes in the mod permissions module. To mitigate this issue and prevent system slowdowns, we adjusted the order of loading files, starting with Tenant 3 (qcp1-02), followed by Tenant 2 (qcp1-01), and finally Tenant 1 (qcp1-00).

Test №1

Test with 1k, 10k, 25k and 50k records files DI started on one tenant only(qcp1-00), and comparative results between Poppy and Quesnelia.

# of records	% creates	File	DI duration Morning Glory	DI duration Nolana	DI duration Orchid	DI duration Poppy	DI duration Quesnelia

# of records	% creates	File	DI duration Morning Glory	DI duration Nolana	DI duration Orchid	DI duration Poppy	DI duration Quesnelia
1,000	100	1k_marc_authority.mrc?api=v2	24 s	27 s	41 sec	29 sec	22 sec -24%
5,000	100	LC_SUBJ_msplit00000000.mrc?api=v2	1 min 21 s	1 min 15 s	1min 21s	1 min 38 sec	1 min 19 sec -19%
10,000	100	msplit00000000.mrc?api=v2	2 min 32 s	2 min 31 s	2min 53s	2 min 53 sec	2 min 36 sec -9.8%
22778 (for Poppy test) 25000 (for Quesnelia test)	100	msplit00000013.mrc?api=v2	11 min 14 s	7 min 7 s	5 min 42s	6 min 24 sec	6 min 19 sec -1.3%
50,000	100	50000_authorityrecords.mrc?api=v2	22 min	11 min 24 s	11 min 11s	13 min 48 sec	11 min 59 sec -13%

Test №2

Test with CICO 5 concurrent users and DI 1K, 5K, 10K, 25K and 50K started on one tenant only.

Сomparative Baseline Check-In\Check-Out results without Data Import between Poppy and Quesnelia.

	CICO, Median time without DI (Poppy)	CICO, 95% time without DI (Poppy)	CICO, Median time without DI (Quesnelia)	CICO, 95% time without DI (Quesnelia)	CICO, Avg time without DI (Quesnelia)

	CICO, Median time without DI (Poppy)	CICO, 95% time without DI (Poppy)	CICO, Median time without DI (Quesnelia)	CICO, 95% time without DI (Quesnelia)	CICO, Avg time without DI (Quesnelia)
Check-In	516 ms	567 ms	503 ms -2.5%	593 ms +4.5%	511 ms
Check-Out	910 ms	2094 ms	836 ms -8%	1117 ms -46%	876 ms

Сomparative Check-In\Check-Out results between Baseline (Quesnelia) and Check-In\Check-Out plus Data Import (Quesnelia.)

# of records (Quesnelia)	DI Duration with CICO (Quesnelia)	CI time Avg (Quesnelia)	CI time 95th pct (Quesnelia)	CO time Avg (Quesnelia)	CO time 95th pct (Quesnelia)	Baseline CI Avg delta	Baseline CI 95th pct delta	Baseline CO Avg delta	Baseline CO 95th pct delta

# of records (Quesnelia)	DI Duration with CICO (Quesnelia)	CI time Avg (Quesnelia)	CI time 95th pct (Quesnelia)	CO time Avg (Quesnelia)	CO time 95th pct (Quesnelia)	Baseline CI Avg delta	Baseline CI 95th pct delta	Baseline CO Avg delta	Baseline CO 95th pct delta
1,000	20 sec	0.560	0.754	1.164	1.313	+9%	+27%	+32%	+17%
5,000	1 min 19 sec	0.701	1.171	1.141	1.790	+37%	+97%	+30%	+60%
10,000	2 min 35 se	0.723	1.024	1.179	1.494	+41%	+72%	+34%	+34%
25,000	6 min 26 sec	0.722	1.024	1.180	1.494	+41%	+72%	+35%	+34%
50,000	12 min 16 sec	0.777	1.045	1.265	1.550	+52%	+76%	+44%	+39%

Сomparative Data Import and Check-In\Check-Out results between Poppy and Quesnelia.

# of records (Poppy)	DI Duration with CICO (Poppy)	CI time Avg (Poppy)	CI time 95th pct (Poppy)	CO time Avg (Poppy)	CO time 95th pct (Poppy)	# of records (Quesnelia)	DI Duration with CICO (Quesnelia)	CI time Avg (Quesnelia)	CI time 95th pct (Quesnelia)	CO time Avg (Quesnelia)	CO time 95th pct (Quesnelia)

# of records (Poppy)	DI Duration with CICO (Poppy)	CI time Avg (Poppy)	CI time 95th pct (Poppy)	CO time Avg (Poppy)	CO time 95th pct (Poppy)	# of records (Quesnelia)	DI Duration with CICO (Quesnelia)	CI time Avg (Quesnelia)	CI time 95th pct (Quesnelia)	CO time Avg (Quesnelia)	CO time 95th pct (Quesnelia)
1,000	35 sec	0.525	0.576	1.078	1.326	1,000	20 sec -42.8%	0.560 +6%	0.754 +30%	1.164 +8%	1.313 -1%
5,000	1 min 41 sec	0.513	0.612	0.9	1.019	5,000	1 min 19 sec -21.7%	0.701 +36%	1.171 +91%	1.141 +26%	1.790 +75%
10,000	3 min 4 sec	0.581	0.685	1.016	1.321	10,000	2 min 35 sec -15.7%	0.723 +24%	1.024 +49%	1.179 +16%	1.494 +13%
22,778	6 min 32 sec	0.598	1.542	1.244	1.729	25,000	6 min 26 sec -1.5%	0.722 +20%	1.024 -33%	1.180 -5%	1.494 -13%
50,000	13 min 48 sec	0.671	1.953	1.51	2.09	50,000	12 min 16 sec -11%	0.777 +15%	1.045 -46%	1.265 -16%	1.550 -25%

Test №3

Multitenant testing

File with 50K, 25K, 10K, 5K, 1K loaded sequences and launched on Tenant1, Tenant2, and Tenant3 for Poppy

File with 50K, 25K, 10K, 5K, 1K loaded sequences and launched on Tenant3, Tenant2 and Tenant1 for Quesnelia

Num of records	Tenant 1 pcp1-00 duration (Poppy)	Tenant 2 pcp1-01 duration (Poppy)	Tenant 3 pcp1-02 duration (Poppy)	Num of records	Tenant 3 qcp1-02 duration (Quesnelia)	Tenant 2 qcp1-01 duration (Quesnelia)	Tenant 1 qcp1-00 duration (Quesnelia)

Num of records	Tenant 1 pcp1-00 duration (Poppy)	Tenant 2 pcp1-01 duration (Poppy)	Tenant 3 pcp1-02 duration (Poppy)	Num of records	Tenant 3 qcp1-02 duration (Quesnelia)	Tenant 2 qcp1-01 duration (Quesnelia)	Tenant 1 qcp1-00 duration (Quesnelia)
1000	66 min	75 min	74 min	1000	15 min 15 sec	15 min 46 sec	16 min