2025-09-03 Meeting notes

2025-09-03 Meeting notes

Meeting Time:  8 am ET /  2 pm CET / 1 pm UK

Meeting URLhttps://openlibraryfoundation.zoom.us/j/89145608254

Password needed: please see link.

 Date

Sep 3, 2025

Housekeeping

  • Convener: @Martina Schildt

  • Minute taker: Sabrina Bayer

  • Next meeting:  Oct 1, 2025

    • Minute taker: Felix Hemme, Karina Georgi, Sabrina Bayer

  • Implementers topics can be posted on https://folio-org.atlassian.net/wiki/x/SABS

  • Future topics can be raised on https://folio-org.atlassian.net/wiki/x/MYFRC

 Homework

  • -

 Discussion topics

  1. Development update

  2. Update on GOKB search integration work

Minutes

Item

Presenter

Notes

Actions

Item

Presenter

Notes

Actions

Development update

@Owen Stephens

Working on the remaining features for Trillium

Two main things: GOKB search integration + Implementation of Acquisition units to Agreement

Acquisition units is well on the way. More information in the next ERM SIG meeting. It can be already seen in snapshot. Acquisitions units can be seen on the Agreement level.

Q Felix: Can you explain why the ACQ units accordion is expanded by default?

A Owen: No reason -> Ensure accordion defaults to closed

Felix: I also would not expect it to be the first accordion.

Where should it be shown? After the agreements periods the ACQ units accordion element is shown at the moment. It should not be shown at the bottom.

It shouldn’t shown with no data, only displays when there are data.

It seems, that the Trillium release date will be pushed back (officially not already announced). This gives us time to do a fuller UAT.

 

Update on GOKB search integration work

@Owen Stephens

Searches + filters already work

Working on the view pane, this includes work with the basket -> see ERM-3774

If the title is not in the local KB (but you can see the package), you can add it to an Agreement line (as external AG type) and then it will later linked automatically to the GOKB title in the local KB (as internal AG type). -> ERM-3795 / ERM-3791

Especially with Pusk KB this process will be automated, there is no additional work to do for the user. With Push KB you have not to do anything if your packages are set to synchronized.

Q Felix: In cases where we have a number of real unlinked AGRLines and a number of temp unlinked AGRLines: Will there be a way to identify the lines that are just in a temp state to monitor if the harvest has been successful? Or would the monitoring be at another place in FOLIO?

A Owen: At the moment not. This would only be needed when you use eHoldings AND local KB at the same time to differentiate between these AGLs.

Next Local KB meeting in four weeks.

Owen makes sure to have an UAT process in place for ACQ units.

 

Chat

 

 Action items

 Decisions