ERM Sprint 83

ERM Sprint 83

Sprint Goal / Focus

  •  

Sprint Schedule

  • Sprint: 83

  • Release: 

  • Quarter: 2020 Q1

  • Start Monday 10 Feb, 2pm UK

  • Finish Friday 21 Feb, 12pm UK



Sprint Capacity

Team AvailabilitySchedule | Calendar

Notes / Exceptions:

Lead Roles:

  • Front End Code Review: 

  • Back End Code Review:  

  • QA: 

QA Environment: folio-testing

Navigation

  1. Sprint Goal / Focus

  2. Sprint Capacity

  3. Review sprint candidates 

  4. Agree technical approach / define key implementation tasks

  5. Finalise estimates / costings

  6. Confirm sprint scope

  7. Confirm first actions





Sprint Planning  

 - not in sprint

 or @ - in sprint 

 

Brought Forward

Feature ID

Issue ID

Sprint Backlog?

Notes / Estimates / Actions

Feature ID

Issue ID

Sprint Backlog?

Notes / Estimates / Actions



https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/ERM-683

@Owen Stephens





https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/ERM-685

@Ethan Freestone

Further ETA 2w 

  • Some backend complications relating to how dates are stored

  • UI setup to follow

  • Dummy UI set up  

  • Assume resources in KBART file are digital

    • though there may be Print Identifiers and Print Publish Date rather than digital equivalents: treat these as digital without the relevant fields)

    • no need to flag lacking publication date (missing identifier should already be reported)



https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/ERM-696

Blocked by https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/ERM-711



https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/ERM-434 / https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/ERM-644 

@steve.osguthorpe  / @Peter Böhm

Further code review changes requested.

Expected to push within the hour. 



https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/ERM-655

@steve.osguthorpe



Sprint Focus

Feature ID

Issue ID

Sprint Backlog?

Notes / Estimates / Actions

Feature ID

Issue ID

Sprint Backlog?

Notes / Estimates / Actions



https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/ERM-700

@steve.osguthorpe

.



https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/ERM-702

@steve.osguthorpe





https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/ERM-711

@steve.osguthorpe

Prioritise above https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/ERM-655



https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/ERM-703

May be required by https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/ERM-711



https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/ERM-698 / https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/ERM-699

Date format should reflect system locale in Edit (as used in View).  Stripes objects pass in the locale. May need separate library (such as moment) to extract the format without affecting value translation. 



https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/ERM-714

@Aditya matukumalli

Pick list explicitly conditionally hidden as part of ERM-683. To be reverted. 



https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/ERM-715

@Aditya matukumalli  / @Peter Böhm

Currently no UI validation in place.  Needs proper backend validation also. Some current experiences: 

  • Backend, eg, is currently forcing decimal values to an integer (Grails autoconversion). 

  • Entering more than 255 characters in text type returns null value.

Frontend validation messages to reflect the type permitted for the specific license term or supplementary information.

Backend validation currently happens after binding. Some extra non-trivial functionality would be needed to intercept raw JSON.  Some straightforward validation options to prioritise: 

  • Required

  • is RefData 



https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/ERM-713

@Gill Osguthorpe @Owen Stephens

Effectively a batch operation, exporting report to tabular format. Should be facilitated easily enough because of JSON handling / output.  New specific JSON file could be created for batch. License endpoints can be filtered by ID/OR. 

Selecting multiple licenses isn't currently possible.

  • Basket is used for agreement resources. Is this an appropriate model for licenses as well. (May need to disambiguate resource and (potential) agreement basket in Agreements going forward.)

  • Or would line-select checkboxes in search results work instead? Pagination could be a gotcha. 

Expected to come ready for licenses in Sprint 84, and packages etc before too long.