2025-05-07 Data Import Subgroup Meeting Notes
Recordings are posted Here (2022+) and Here (pre-2022) Slack channel for Q&A, discussion between meetings
Requirements details Here Additional discussion topics in Subgroup parking lot
Attendees: @Whitney Christopher @Jennifer Eustis @Katie Rahman @kimberly wiljanen, @Raegan Wiechert , @Robert Pleshar , @tess amram, @Ryan Taylor @cathy tuohy @Lynne Fors @Yael Hod
Notetaker:
Links:
Agenda:
Topic | Who | Meeting Notes | Related Jira | Decisions/Actions |
Announcements | ALL |
|
|
|
Prioritization Poll | ALL | Results of Jira Prioritization Poll
Create single log entry for a batch import jobs that are split rather than a log entry for each sub-batch of 1000 records
Thanks to Lynne’s poll, there were a total of 8 responses. The votes corresponding to the order above are: 6,5,2,2,2,1. Jennifer put this on the PC Communities Priorities board. In future, we want to rely on votes. The one with the highest votes is https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UXPROD-2829 . However, because it is a draft, it doesn’t appear in any of our dashboards. Could the status be changed to open? then it would appear in our open list of issues? |
| Related Jira discussed in meeting that could open up the data file types used in Data Import to support work in other areas: https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UXPROD-5253 |
DI a SIG or working group discussion |
| Conversations have occurred in MM SIG, Acqusitions SIG, and App Interaction SIG. The consensus in these groups is that DI should become a SIG. DI is much more than Inventory and bibliographic data. Some in Acq SIG mentioned that they didn’t come because they felt the focus was too much on bib records.
|
| We are now a SIG! Looking for a group of notetakers.
|
Ask from community on asynchronous input | MM SIG/various | In MM SIG on 4/24/2025, several people mentioned that they couldn’t attend DI meetings. There is no meeting time. People would like to see more asynchronous ways to provide input and be proactive on how DI evolves. Ideas:
|
|
|
https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UIDATIMP-1329 https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UIDATIMP-1328 | Old Request for use case | Field mapping profile: limit the list of linkable action profiles based on FOLIO record type. |
|
|
All | Do not process incoming record if it is a duplicate in the file Waiting for confirmation from SMEs. |
|
| |
| Disallow usage of Update MARC Bib next to Update Instance actions |
|
|
Upcoming meetings/agenda topics: --
Chat: