2022-10-05 Data Import Subgroup meeting
Recordings are posted Here (2022+) and Here (pre-2022) Slack channel for Q&A, discussion between meetings
Requirements details Here Additional discussion topics in Subgroup parking lot
Attendees: Ann-Marie Breaux (Deactivated) Jennifer Eustis Monica Arnold Christie Thomas leeda.adkins@duke.edu Lynne Fors Raegan Wiechert Taylor Smith Alexander Soto Christie Thomas Jamie Jesanis (Unlicensed)
Current development (Nolana)
Agenda topics:
No meeting on 19 October
050 mapping issue
Finalize expected behavior
2 050s Instance: keep current behavior
2 050s Holdings/Item: only take data from 1st 050 if there are multiple
1 050 with 2 $a Instance: Split at 2nd $a if possible
1 050 with 2 $a Holdings/Item: Use 1st $a (and $b if mapped); ignore any subsequent $a's
OCLC prefers call numbers from the bottom up, so starts with 090, then moves up from there (to the bottom-most 050, if multiples)
Apply to other repeatable fields/subfields that populate non-repeatable fields? Only with regards to classification?
060 NLM (in the default MARC-Instance map): Handle same as 050 for Instance, Holdings/Item
080 UDC (in the default MARC-Instance map): Switch the default instance map, no need to change holdings/item handling
082 Dewey (in the default MARC-Instance map): No changes for now; revisit in the future if necessary
Usually only has classification in it, not the Cutter per ... 092 used for library's full call number
082 is the most commonly used classification field in Latin America, per ...
086 GDC (in the default MARC-Instance map): No change to default instance map; use 1st if multiple 086s in the record
090 (in the default MARC-Instance map): Handle same as 050 for Instance, Holdings/Item
092 (not in the default MARC-Instance map): No changes (probably only 1 $a and 1 $b, and only 1 092 field in the record) revisit in the future if necessary
Update on Importing MARC to create orders
A-M add notes
Update individual MARC fields (and by extension, Instance fields)
Confirm - examples supplied? (existing MARC Bib, update MARC Bib, expected FOLIO behavior, send to A-M via Slack or e-mail)
... : From KB provider: brief update - basic bib info plus an 856; don't want to touch the existing 245, 26x, 6xx, 7xx, etc.
... : add multiple 903s for HathiTrust info, when the existing bib only has one 903
... : updates from authority vendors - only want to update authorized fields
... : Adding OCLC numbers to existing records SLACK
... : RDA update fields (33xs) E-MAIL
... : Commitment statements (583/506) E-MAIL
... : Repeatable 9xx fields
Upcoming meetings:
12 October 2022
Create/update multiple holdings and items from individual MARC Bib records. Please send sample files to abreaux@ebsco.com
From Me to Everyone 01:00 PM
https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UXPROD-662
From Leeda Adkins to Everyone 01:03 PM
I'm on vacation Weds Nov. 2
From Leeda Adkins to Everyone 01:12 PM
Our system currently populates from the 1st 050
That explains why our WorldShare records usually have labels with the second call no, thanks Raegan! That has puzzled me
From Christie Thomas (she/her) to Everyone 01:19 PM
I think that this is fine.
From Leeda Adkins to Everyone 01:37 PM
That's triggering a memory of when Duke used Dewey, we used 092
From Jennifer Eustis (she/her) to Everyone 01:37 PM
We don't have any dewey
From Lynne Fors to Everyone 01:38 PM
We use 092, but nothing new is coming in as Dewey. We reclass in LC
From Alex Soto to Everyone 01:39 PM
In LATAM 082 is the most common tag for libraries,
From jeanette kalchik to Everyone 01:43 PM
The 086 might need to be reviewed more
I know if there are multiple items it might have multiple 086 ex OCLC 1319732919