2021-05-19 Data Import Subgroup meeting
Recordings are posted Here
Attendees: @Ann-Marie Breaux (Deactivated) , @Jennifer Eustis , @leeda.adkins@duke.edu, @Lisa McColl @Lloyd Chittenden @Monica Arnold @Nick Cappadona @Timothy Watters @Christie Thomas @Jenn Colt
Agenda topics:
Current development status
POs will be identifying at risk Juniper features and splitting/moving features into Kiwi, so that we can then confirm how much of the pointing exercise features can be brought into Kiwi development
Question from Leeda - local control number in 901 $a - how to add to FOLIO Instance?
Update the default MARC-to-Instance map to include the 901: MARC Mappings Information
If Instances already exist, run Ian Walls' script to update the instances
And after that, the instances will have the local control number and can be used for matching for future imports
And any new future imports will include the local control number in the Instance data automatically, based on the updated default map
Follow up from last week
Using Rancher for testing
Will be setting up a site for Data Import and quickMARC SMEs
Profiles, users, data will stick around instead of being wiped out; will be helpful if folks set up separate users for themselves, so it's easier to tell who is doing what (right now, we all use diku_admin on the hosted sites, so it can get confusing)
A-M to add info about the data elements at the bottom of the SRS MARC record
Add any other questions you think would be helpful
How are MARC Bibs, Holdings, Authorities distinguished in SRS?
When an SRS MARC JSON record is updated, is the raw MARC blob also updated?
Default behaviors (implicit/explicit) - START HERE NEXT WEEK
A-M started a spreadsheet; will this be helpful as a way to make the relationships between the actions clearer?
Added rows for quickMARC edit/create actions and Instances created by POLs
Lehigh MARC program creates SRS MARC for the new orders as well as Instances. In FOLIO, currently POLs only create Instances, not SRS MARCs
HOMEWORK: Is the spreadsheet a good way to organize info, or should we try something different? What should be added or changed? Is there a better way to present this?
Christie question
Re: acq workflow: MARC external program (from Lehigh) creates the order order, which in turn creates Inventory records; creates both Instance and SRS MARC; then have to import and overlay with final shelfready data
POL matchpoint/Vendor system number matchpoint - not currently available for Inventory matching, unless stored as an identifier in the instance. Draft story here
Need to be able to update the Instance without updating the MARC (but this would only be for Instance fields that are not controlled by the underlying MARC); make sure there is a way to transport non-MARC data for updating the instance in a MARC record, without affecting the SRS MARC
Confirm this is what happens when a MARC is only updating a holdings or item, and then make sure we have a way to do this for instances
Per Christie, not sure this will provide what they need long-term; need to be able to manage Instance record data separate from the SRS MARC
Jennifer E: maybe have a small working group on what happens to the versioning, so that we take into account quickMARC and orders; per Ann-Marie there's enough overlap with our subgroup members that we probably don't need a separate subgroup
Surfacing errors in log summaries
Fix column sorting - will help with large results sets
Export – only errors? All?
EDIFACT Invoices
Import job monitoring and alerting e-mails - POSTPONE UNTIL NEXT WEEK
Review proposed implementation
Discuss default e-mail text
Text chat - copy from file after it's posted