2019-12-18 Consortia SIG Meeting Notes

2019-12-18 Consortia SIG Meeting Notes

Date

Dec 18, 2019

Attendees

  • @David Dahl

  • @Peter Murray

  • @Brooks Travis 

  • @Steve Walker

  • @Brooks Travis

  • @Lloyd Chittenden

  • @Sebastian Hammer

  • @Hkaplanian

  • @Steve Bischof

  • @Kelly Drake

  • @zyang

  • @Elena OMalley

  • @Theda Schwing

  • @Lucy Harrison

Goals

  • Continue creating JIRA's for CTUR

Discussion items

Time

Item

Who

Notes

Time

Item

Who

Notes

5min

Housekeeping/updates

All

Next meeting is Jan. 8th

Libris update

  • is it open source? Harry says "yes" based on what he's heard from Chalmers; it's also being used in France

  • might require some translation for English in UI; suspicions are that English translations might already be there

  • Libris uses linked data and can produce MARC

  • Is there interest beyond consortia? sounds like there could be (MM SIG)

  • @Hkaplanian  will talk to Chalmers and maybe set up some demos for Consortia SIG, MM SIG (and maybe at WOLFcon)

WOLFcon

  • session on two different consortia implementation models; can it be recorded? sounds like that should be possible

45min 

JIRAs for cross-tenant unmediated requests

All 

ReShare

  • big distinction is partners involved in transaction - library-to-library vs. library-to-patron

  • would FOLIO have to use NCIP for ReShare integration? probably not; there could be a deeper integration using FOLIO APIs

    • potential - "real-time" inventory updates to ReShare shared index; real-time circ

Trello board review

  • first, determine how things will show up in the UI

    • "Requests placed by patrons of other libraries with whom there is a ctur agreement appear in the Request app's request queue"

      • who is the requester (patron library or patron)?

        • might not even matter; owning library doesn't need any patron info to process request

      • how is the delivery address populated?

      • observation: similar to how remote storage integration is planned

      • additional features: route a request to acquisitions (because it's cheaper to buy the item than it is to deliver it between libraries)

10min

Wrap-up/planning

All

Lots of interesting discussion; we'll pick it up in January!

Action items