2019-02-13 - Consortia SIG Notes

2019-02-13 - Consortia SIG Notes

Date

Feb 13, 2019

Attendees

  • @David Dahl

  • @Steve Walker

  • @Peter Murray

  • @Theda Schwing

  • @Peter Sbrzesny

  • @Martina Tumulla

  • @Kristen Wilson

  • @Paula Sullenger

  • @Noah Brubaker

Goals

Discussion items

Time

Item

Who

Notes

Time

Item

Who

Notes

5min

Housekeeping/updates

All

Sprint recording: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8yWa_zJxnM&feature=youtu.be

 

20min 

Follow-up on last week's data import discussion (UXPROD-1419)

  • what use cases exist for cross-tenant use given the scope of data for Data Import app? 

All 

 Any use cases for data import across tenants?

  • bib records for ebooks; might not be an issue if this can be handled through ERM functionality

  • no scenarios for order/invoice loads across multiple tenants

What other use cases exist (regardless of Data Import feature scope)?

  • Vendor data - possibly just a one-time activity on system implementation/migration (UXPROD-817 - remove orders/invoices reference)

  • License information

  • Circulation policies (reciprocal borrowing agreements) - possibly just a one-time load but might be a need to do this iteratively for new libraries or for changes in policies

  • Fund/budget structure -

  • Central fund management for EBA/DDA collections?

    • keeping track of institutions that are incurring fees; tracking which libraries are using it the most

    may be part of UXPROD-823 (earmark for future discussion)
  • E-resources data - ERM data for resources provided by consortia or state-level groups; might be more of a global configuration change (this might apply to a lot of these use cases)

    • there might be some opportunities to utilize GoKB for some of these group-negotiated e-resource packages

  • Users - loading users of other libraries in a consortium (ideally, though, this data would be shared across tenants rather than loaded into each tenant)

25min

UXPROD-795 - overlap with functionality anticipated in ReShare

All

Group-level resource sharing/circulation

  • what does this entail?

    • fits somewhere between ILL and walk-in consortial borrowers

    • patrons can place holds on items at the consortial level

      • request goes directly to owning institution

      • item gets checked out at patron's home library

      • should result in quicker delivery

      • more generous loan durations

      • patrons can choose to pick up libraries at any member library

  • this sounds like it is exactly the goal of the ReShare MVP

 

10min

Wrap-up/planning

All

 

Action items