2026-04-07 Consortia SIG Notes
Attendees
@Vivian Gould @Darsi Rueda @Dennis Bridges @Katie Rahman @Bernd Oberknapp @Lloyd Chittenden
Discussion items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
5 | Housekeeping & Announcements | All | Consortia questions on FOLIO Census Add to Census
Darsi will get the questions worded and bring back to the group for review at next meeting. Instead we’ll update the directory
|
| Discussion on Consortia: Ongoing discussion about the various types of consortia, how they do business, what their needs are, generally and in the FOLIO environment.
| All | Levels of consortia (completely independent, simple, complex, national) Possible angle: what are top ten things these consortia do. Use cases e.g., “we’re ordering electronic journals for member libraries” “we’re managing permissions”
Dennis walked through some miro diagrams of different profiles/types of consortia. These were created with a resource sharing focus. Types: National Library, Diverse centralized consortium, Complex Library, Highly centralized consortium (single tenant) in ECS there is cross-tenant circulation, but lacks some tools you’d expect to have as a consortium of libraries. e.g., if request denied, doesn’t go back in the queue. It functions more like circulation at a single library. (no geographic location choice, etc.) Feedback included a better way to tell if the system was single or multi tenant; what is meant by “central” And of course there were some attendees today whose consortium did not fit into any type. This is the hard part about consortia! FOLIO doesn’t yet handle all of these configurations, but that’s the end goal. Multi-system model is missing from this. We can devote our 3rd Tuesday of the month meeting to deeper dives about this diagram and the different models of consortia described. And then the FOLIO features and gaps for each model. |
Action items