2022-09-26 Meeting notes

2022-09-26 Meeting notes

Attendees

  • @Paula Sullenger 

  • @Mike Gorrell 

  • @Tom Cramer 

  • @Simeon Warner 

  • @Leander Seige 

  • @keven lw 

  • @dracine 

  • @Kirstin Kemner-Heek 

  • @Ian Ibbotson (Use this one) 

  • @Hkaplanian 

  • @Kathleen Berry 

  • @Boaz Nadav Manes

Guests: @Jesse Koennecke (PC); @Ian Walls (ByWater); @Marc Johnson 

Discussion items

Item

Who

Notes

Item

Who

Notes

Treasurer's report

Paula

  • Update - not much new to report

  • Timescale for developer funding (current commitment is through end Dec 2022)?

    • Funding for the full FY is possible - see CC Google Drive / treasurer

      • As long as no others expenses are pressing: keep him until June 2023 - Tom, Kirstin

      • Decision CC: Proposal accepted! 

  • What reserve level we would like to aim for (currently have $90k which is about 3 months, best practice is 3-6 months)?

    • Decision CC: have 6 month reserve right now is accepted - better a year in the long run

    • Set up 3-month reserve now

Cross council meetings

Mike

Discussion with other chair/co-chairs re. quarterly cross-council meetings and more frequent chairs' touch base

  • Ensure update from the meetings to the councils / keep minutes 

FOLIO resourcing group

Tom, Harry, Ians

Update (notes in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sZFdV6FgvtfBOgRFTuXQ3ipUcroQTch0Y7itELqt-58/edit)

  • Summary by Tom Cramer  - 4 meetings so far

  • Discussion of 2 models ("Ian Walls model" / "centralized model"), one more will be provided by Marko

  • Paula: be aware of changing the governance model itself - it is still quite fresh instead of try to change things in the recent structures → we might get stuck in longish discussions otherwise

Proposed group to create vision for FOLIO builds

Simeon

"Pitch for Proposed vision for future FOLIO builds" from Julie Bickle

  • Summary by Simeon

Things that Could be Better About FOLIO

Tom

Discuss responses in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-F613EM2d4pOwgRQobRQyS0k5T2T9RjoprNcfA_NLa0/edit

  • Tom presented the results

  • 50 - 60 feedbacks

  • Feedback from CC?  Next steps?

    • Mike G.: needs to be reviewed

    • Marc: positive: very open, frank feedback; good, that people are speaking up

    • Ian W.: "Quality of data analysis" as a tool to analyse the results?

    • Paula, Kirstin: "I've read through them but haven't been able to really think about it yet"

    • Simeon: Collect a set of themes would be helpful  - nothing shocking, but the openness is impressing

    • Mike G: Any volunteers?  

    • Action item: Collect more feedback for 1 or 2 weeks is fine - be aware not to ask the same people again

    • Tom: Be aware to collect the input from all 3 areas, we might identify: functional, technical, strategical

    • Action item: Ian W.  volunteers to start the analysis

    • Action item: set up a new document ordered by themes → Tom!   

    • Action item: Proposal by Tom to present the feedback questions to TC / PC to let them ask their "3 people" as well → Mike G., Simeon

Additional agenda items

CC

Harry: Takeaway from WOLFcon: "How can I inform myself about the project / status of development"?

 

 

Next week:

  • LOC joining FOLIO