| | |
|---|
Announcements & Agenda for Meeting (5 min) | @Paul Kloppenborg @Tom Cramer | Announcements Objectives Common understanding and agreement on core challenges facing the FOLIO with regard to community-sustained software development. Brief summaries of each artifact / model then structured input from each CC member and any interested community participant
Process
|
Model 1: FOLIO Blueprint (5 min) | @Tom Cramer | Summary Presentation (4 slides) Origin: March summit notes → 35-page doc distilled into a slide deck. Highlights: • Annual AWS spend (~\$500 K) exceeds membership revenue (~\$340 K). • No centralized funding mechanism for software maintenance/development. • Proposes expanding revenue streams (institutions, hosts, dev firms) and funding central roles (release manager, QA lead).
|
Model 2: Contribution Network (5-10 min) | @Mike Gorrell | Goals: Developer marketplace for matching dev organizations with needs. Multiple revenue streams for hosting providers & others to sponsor code + maintenance. Mechanism for pooled funding of joint initiatives. Maintenance-weight “pointing” system to quantify module upkeep effort (100 points ≈ 1 FTE).
Maintenance funding options: • General support pool • Module sponsorship by organizations • Second-tier expert support pool for specialized issues Next step: Assemble dev experts to validate pointing system and estimate historical maintenance effort.
|
Model 3: Community Driven Development Working Group (5 min) | @Jeremy Huff @Jenn Colt @Charlotte Whitt | Introduces a Development Initiative Proposal (DIP) process with 7 phases: Draft & submit proposal Council feedback & iteration Three-council endorsement RFP issuance via FOLIO.org MOU & resource collection Development & integration into release cycle Archival on completion
Benefits: strengthens governance, enables access to pooled funds, embeds maintenance planning in proposals. Encourages assigning a liaison to shepherd each initiative.
|
Reactions (5 min) | Everyone (working individually) | Each meeting participant provide their reactions to the documents in this reactions doc, addressing two questions: 1. what are the top (1-3) core problems to address 2. what are the top (1-3) solutions to explore Emerging themes: • Maintenance vs. new features: distinct funding/prioritization buckets needed. • Resource constraints: AWS hosting costs consume community budgets. • Governance effectiveness: call for more streamlined, not necessarily heavier, governance. • Community-hosted environments: potential to offload AWS cost by leveraging institutional infrastructure.
|
Moderated Discussion (20 min) | Everyone | |
Next Steps (5 min) | @Paul Kloppenborg @Tom Cramer | |