2023-09-11 Meeting notes: UI options for "save" button | part II
Date
Sep 11, 2023
Meeting Time: 12 pm ET / 5 pm UK / 6 pm CET
Zoom
Meeting URL: https://zoom.us/j/869183544 - Password needed: please see here.
Recordings Mondays (since February 2022)
Housekeeping
Convener and notes @Martina Schildt
Next meeting: Sep 20, 2023
Discussion items
UI options for "save" button
Mock-ups (@Gill Osguthorpe )
Minutes
Background to why we discuss this topic:
The need for a "save" button / a just "save" option has been raised in different SIGs and has been discussed in the App Interaction SIG
there is already work going on in Quickmarc to have a "save & keep editing" button
but there are more options when it comes to saving, such as "create another" which is a checkbox at the moment
important: there should not be too many buttons
to have a good and consistent UI @Gill Osguthorpe has created some mock-ups with different options
MM SIG had presented some suggestions in a previous meeting, but was absolutely fine to continue with Gill's mock-ups
Gill demos the mock-ups and the different options
Zak: we need to establish a pattern of how things are displayed - implementation is done by the various development teams themselves and is done per app
each feature such as "save and keep editing", "save and duplicate" needs to be implemented for each application separately
the pattern is supposed to be a pattern across all apps
immediate votes in the call on Gill's mock-ups
A1 +1
B2 +3
C2 +2 - set action and have it persist
general feedback: any of the options is fine, it would be great to have a separate save option and consistency
Phil: If we choose option A - "save & close" and drop-down icon: it would be good to have the buttons be displayed in the same colour for it to be obvious that both buttons are selectable and clickable
Thomas in chat: The solid background is usually used for the ‘default’ option, so I can see that.
Gill presents one more option that is not part of the survey:
Instead of having a primary button, the button displays "Actions" and a drop-down - from the drop-down list all available save options can be picked
Feedback: Having an actions button and then display the options seems too much clicking to the group - the group votes for having a default option - so that at least one action can be performed with one click
Autosave is raised as an alternatove or additional option for the save button
Phil in chat: Would an autosave after 60 secs and every minute after be an option for 'save and continue'?
Laura in chat as a response: Some of us don't want autosave, as we like the option to back out if we have made errors
Jackie agrees in chat: Exactly!
Thomas in chat: Agreed.. I fell it would be risky without a roll back feature
Laura in chat: that is, just close to revert to previous version
Phil: the need and "risk" may be different in different apps - e.g. Licenses (yes/no change) vs. Inventory (complicated cataloguing changes)
Owen in chat: The “save & keep editing” option might need some thought as I understand in quickmarc there are some issues with the screen refreshing on save
Raegan agrees: reloading takes a lot of time - you need to scroll back to the accordion/information where you have left - that takes too much time
Zak: we need to agree on a pattern that will then work across all apps
Please vote on your preferred options via this survey: https://forms.gle/uvpA6VjZ1yENTyvm7. The survey can be shared. Deadline Sep 19, 2023 end of day.
The results, requirements and next steps will be discussed on Sep 20, 2023.
Next steps
Chat
18:01:45 From Martina Schildt | VZG To Everyone:
2023-09-11 Meeting notes: UI options for "save" button | part II
18:05:20 From Laura Daniels To Everyone:
I'm happy to see so many of my MM colleagues here today.
18:10:49 From Maura Byrne To Everyone:
I like the idea of a “Save” button and a “Save and…” button. Could they have keyboard shortcuts, so we wouldn’t have to use a mouse?
18:12:53 From Thomas Trutt To Everyone:
Replying to "I like the idea of a..."
If so a variation like CTL+ S for Save and CTL+SHIFT+S for save and —, would be nice and hopefully easy to remember.
18:13:05 From Laura Daniels To Everyone:
Reacted to "If so a variation li..." with ➕
18:13:08 From Maura Byrne To Everyone:
Reacted to "If so a variation li..." with ➕
18:14:26 From Thomas Trutt To Everyone:
Actually in another meeting a while back someone suggested a ‘dumb’ system for users preferences. It would be a new app but basically just a datastore.
18:17:04 From Phil Adams To Everyone:
Thanks for the presentation. I easily understand 'Save' as meaning 'Save and continue, keep editing'
18:17:51 From Laura Daniels To Everyone:
I'm also a fan of the short labels (might be easier to translate also?)
18:17:59 From Maura Byrne To Everyone:
Reacted to "I'm also a fan of th..." with 👍
18:18:03 From Phil Adams To Everyone:
Reacted to "I'm also a fan of th..." with 👍
18:18:23 From Thomas Trutt To Everyone:
Reacted to "I'm also a fan of th..." with 💯
18:18:36 From Gill Osguthorpe To Everyone:
Reacted to "Thanks for the prese..." with 👍🏼
18:18:41 From Gill Osguthorpe To Everyone:
Reacted to "I'm also a fan of th..." with 👍
18:18:45 From Jackie Magagnosc To Everyone:
Reacted to "I'm also a fan of th..." with 👍
18:18:46 From Phil Adams To Everyone:
Save and copy might be another useful option
18:18:56 From Maura Byrne To Everyone:
Reacted to "Thanks for the prese..." with 👍🏼
18:20:26 From Jackie Magagnosc To Everyone:
Having consistent options and behaviors across apps would be such a huge gain.
18:20:50 From Laura Daniels To Everyone:
thank you for keeping our expectations realistic, Zak
18:21:24 From Maura Byrne To Everyone:
Reacted to "Having consistent op..." with 👍
18:21:27 From Natascha Owens To Everyone:
Reacted to "Having consistent op..." with 👍
18:21:29 From Phil Adams To Everyone:
Reacted to "Having consistent op..." with 👍
18:21:35 From Maura Byrne To Everyone:
Reacted to "thank you for keepin..." with 💯
18:21:50 From Phil Adams To Everyone:
Reacted to "thank you for keepin..." with 👍
18:21:56 From Dung-Lan Chen To Everyone:
Reacted to "Having consistent op..." with 👍
18:23:44 From Dung-Lan Chen To Everyone:
+1 to Laura
18:24:08 From Natascha Owens To Everyone:
I am just a bit unsure about how long the list might get depending on how many options we introduce and then have that repeated in the Primary button action list
18:24:51 From Maura Byrne To Everyone:
Big Yes for Thomas’s point
18:26:07 From Thomas Trutt To Everyone:
The solid background is usually used for the ‘default’ option, so I can see that.
18:28:12 From Dung-Lan Chen To Everyone:
Yes, reducing clicking is important to my staff.
18:28:20 From Thomas Trutt To Everyone:
Replying to "I am just a bit unsu..."
To Zak’s point it I think this would depend on each app and probably each form. What options are added by the devs for that app/form.
18:28:26 From Kristin Martin To Everyone:
Reacted to "Yes, reducing clicki..." with 👍
18:28:31 From Jackie Magagnosc To Everyone:
Reacted to "Yes, reducing clicki..." with 👍
18:28:35 From Laura Daniels To Everyone:
Reacted to "Yes, reducing clicki..." with 👍
18:30:06 From Kristin Martin To Everyone:
Save and Keep Editing feels like it should be the primary option.
18:30:19 From Jackie Magagnosc To Everyone:
Reacted to "Save and Keep Editin..." with 👍
18:31:48 From Thomas Trutt To Everyone:
Agreed.. I think it also follows patterns already out there.
18:32:14 From Phil Adams To Everyone:
Would an autosave after 60 secs and every minute after be an option for 'save and continue'?
18:32:57 From Laura Daniels To Everyone:
Replying to "Would an autosave af..."
Some of us don't want autosave, as we like the option to back out if we have made errors
18:33:07 From Jackie Magagnosc To Everyone:
Replying to "Would an autosave af..."
Exactly!
18:33:18 From Thomas Trutt To Everyone:
Replying to "Would an autosave af..."
Agreed.. I fell it would be risky without a roll back feature
18:33:19 From Laura Daniels To Everyone:
Replying to "Would an autosave af..."
that is, just close to revert to previous version
18:33:38 From Maura Byrne To Everyone:
Reacted to "that is, just close ..." with 👍
18:34:12 From Owen Stephens To Everyone:
The “save & keep editing” option might need some thought as I understand in quickmarc there are some issues with the screen refreshing on save
18:34:24 From Laura Daniels To Everyone:
Reacted to "The “save & keep edi..." with ☝️
18:35:32 From Natascha Owens To Everyone:
I'm sure I would be happy with any of these options but would love for my coworkers to get a chance to vote--is voting open to anyone?
18:36:35 From Maura Byrne To Everyone:
Replying to "I'm sure I would be ..."
Maybe you can show the mockups to your staff, and see which they prefer, and you can have a “departmental” vote.
Attendees
Present | Name | Home Organization |
|---|---|---|
| Amanda Ros | TAMU |
| Ann-Marie Breaux | EBSCO |
| Brooks Travis | EBSCO |
x | Charlotte Whitt | Index Data |
| Dennis Bridges | EBSCO |
x | Dung-Lan Chen | Skidmore College |
x | Gill Osguthorpe | UX/UI Designer - K-Int |
| Heather McMillan Thoele | TAMU |
| Ian Ibbotson | Developer Lead - K-Int |
| Jana Freytag | VZG, Göttingen |
| Khalilah Gambrell | EBSCO |
| Kimberly Pamplin | TAMU |
| Kirstin Kemner-Heek | VZG, Göttingen |
x | Kristin Martin | Chicago |
x | Laura Daniels | Cornell |
| Lloyd Chittenden | Marmot Library Network |
| Marc Johnson | K-Int |
x | Martina Schildt | VZG, Göttingen |
| Martina Tumulla | hbz, Cologne |
x | Maura Byrne | Chicago |
| Mike Gorrell | Index Data |
x | Natascha Owens | Chicago |
x | Owen Stephens | Product Owner - Owen Stephens Consulting |
| Patty Wanninger | EBSCO |
| Sara Colglazier | Five Colleges / Mount Holyoke College Library |
| Kimie Kester | EBSCO |
x | John Coburn | EBSCO |
x | Zak Burke | EBSCO |
x | Thomas Trutt |
|
x | Phil Adams |
|
x | Jackie Magagnosc |
|
x | Catherine Tuohy |
|
x | Jean Pajerek | Cornell |
x | Raegan Wiechert |
|