Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

Heorhii's Work

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

ARCHPriorityPlanned Completion dateNotesQuestions

ARCH-32 - Getting issue details... STATUS





ARCH-29 - Getting issue details... STATUS





ARCH-30 - Getting issue details... STATUS




Authority control reporting for Orchid/Poppy releases
        1. List of :Support reporting: requirements prioritization.
        2. UI wireframes on how it's expected to look like to properly build solution around actual UX expectations.
        3. "These reports may be accessible from Inventory app or Authority app or Export Manager or Data export "
            -  which UI component is supposed to be used for this representation and which format it should have? (sketches are welcome to get clear picture of FE - BE way of interaction)
        4. "These reports may be available as a csv export " - is this option available after outline of report on View or beforehand?
            - asking as it is possible to handle request on both FE or Back-end side.
            - is this csv supposed to be consumed by any other component?
        5. "In addition Inventory or Authority app may have additional facets/filters to allow a user To filter Authority records based on whether the record is linked to a bib field/record or not. To filter bib records based on linked status of a bib field/record "
            - needs UI wireframes and more details as this functionality can be implemented on Front-End (w/o server call) or Back-End side.
                    E.g.: if filtering or facet search is required only within loaded on UI records - then solution could be done on Front-end side only

ARCH-31 - Getting issue details... STATUS




 Authority control - autolink per quickMARC bib record
        1. Details on autolink and expected outcomes from solutions side. Is that about to find authority by provided identifiers during creation / updating?
            if yes:
                - will User be able to choose if they want to selected / deselect automatic linkage (when possible)?
                - in case if autolinkage failed and fields left unlinked should it be reported? How exactly (format)?
                - details on Data Import process expected changes with autolinking applying (2 phases? - 1 actual entities import; 2 - linkage?)

ARCH-33 - Getting issue details... STATUS





ARCH-34 - Getting issue details... STATUS





ARCH-35 - Getting issue details... STATUS










  • No labels