Recordings are posted Here (2022+) and Here (pre-2022) Slack channel for Q&A, discussion between meetings
Requirements details Here Additional discussion topics in Subgroup parking lot
Attendees: Ann-Marie Breaux (Deactivated)
Lotus
- Still working on updating Lotus release notes
- Lotus Hotfix Bug created for the job profile problem - may be related to a problem with Holdings Source - still triaging
- Also Lotus Hotfix Bug for Settings/Data Import panes UI - still in process
Morning Glory
- Morning Glory Folijet and Spitfire planning: dashboard where you can see the current scope and status of Data Import work for Morning Glory
- Completed work:
- Adding Admin notes to the 3 Inventory field mapping screens
- Log refinements: UI for deleting logs (no backend yet)
- POL/VRN matching Backend (no UI yet)
- Inventory Holdings POL connection: retroactive or not?
- Current work:
- Backend of deleting logs
- Field protection refinement
- Flow control (to help Single Record Imports and MARC Authority UI deletes not get stuck)
- Analysis of additional MARC-MARC matching refinement beyond what was delivered in Lotus
- Matching from all repeated fields of an incoming MARC to all repeated fields in an existing MARC (e.g. all 035s to all 035s)
- Adding indicator wildcards
- Tangential: will analyze whether there is a way to deduplicate OCLC 035s with same number but different prefixes (seems like it might be needed during import and as on-demand)
Agenda topics:
- Log refinement: finalize a few outstanding questions:
- See PPT here
- See Jira feature here
- Make error details easier to find - stories not yet written
- HOMEWORK: Review slides 9-21: If we want to show more error details on the summary screen (so that user doesn't have to click into the details screen for each error). how could we do that? Several examples of errors from Lotus Bugfest. How could this kind of information be consolidated into something meaningful on the log screen? Please add comments to this wiki page before next week's meeting.
- Navigation from log back to Landing page vs View all page - stories not yet written - A-M review with devs
- HOMEWORK: Review slides 27-29: Would this be a useful change? Right now users are always taken back to the Landing page, unless you use the browser Back button instead of the "x". If you have filtered jobs on the View all page, you'll lose those filters. Please add comments to this wiki page before next week's meeting.
- implementers topics list like Acq SIG?
- Development questions/discussion take priority; these would be discussion topics when there are not dev topics.
- If so, and if A-M creates the page, would someone volunteer to maintain it? Yay Leeda!
- Yes: A-M create page
- Jennifer: Would be helpful to have better handling of 856s in Holdings (which could also apply to any MARC mappings into Holdings and Item fields)
- Be able to differentiate by indicator, so that user could specify import the resource's 856 only, or both the resource and a related one (differentiate by indicator)
- Being able to differentiate by indicator would also allow for assigning different relationship values for different 856s; right now, the user can only pick 1 relationship value for all 856s being mapped into Holdings or Item
- Making sure multiple 856s are not concatenated
- Only brings in the first 856
- Would there be a way to adjust mapping syntax to say "bring in all, bring in first only, pay attention to indicators" A-M to talk with devs - how difficult? would it still be possible to validate in UI?
- Examples:
- 856$u/* = import all 856s
- 856$u/1 = import first 856 only
- question: what would 856$u trigger? all 856s or first only?
- 856[1 ]$u = import only 856 with indicators 1[blank] (and if multiple 856s with the same indicators, would this trigger all to be imported or only the first one?)
- 856[1 ]$u/1 = import only the first 856 with indicators 1[blank]
- Examples:
- Be able to differentiate by indicator, so that user could specify import the resource's 856 only, or both the resource and a related one (differentiate by indicator)
Zoom chat:
From Taylor Smith to Everyone 01:00 PM
hello
From Jenn Colt to Everyone 01:07 PM
When the UUIDs for the holdings types got changed. Hosting had to change it back to the old UUID
From Christie Thomas (she/her) to Everyone 01:17 PM
It would be great if both work because I find it useful to not update the instance and holdings if there is not an item match, too.
thank you!
From Jenn Colt to Everyone 01:17 PM
i don't want to redo my profiles 🙂
From Christie Thomas (she/her) to Everyone 01:17 PM
me either!
From Christie Thomas (she/her) to Everyone 01:35 PM
I am pretty sure it was not retroactive.
From Raegan Wiechert to Everyone 01:52 PM
People are talking
From Jenn Colt to Everyone 01:52 PM
i think you aren’t hearing us
From Christie Thomas (she/her) to Everyone 01:52 PM
I think you cannot hear us?
From Leeda Adkins to Everyone 01:52 PM
Can you hear us AM?
From Jennifer Eustis (she/her) to Everyone 01:53 PM
We can hear you
From Christie Thomas (she/her) to Everyone 01:53 PM
we can hear you.
I have to run to another meeting. I will see you all next week.