Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
Date
Attendees
Discussion items
| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|
| 5min | Housekeeping | | |
| 20min | Mapping fine/fee to locations | | |
| 20min | Permissions for fine/fee | |
|
| 10min | Workflow engine update | Cate Boerema (Deactivated) |
|
Notes
- Mapping fee/fine to locations
- Permissions for the settings (fee/fines)
- David: Settings vs. permissions for only a few people
- Owner Level: balances/time etc. should be at the level of the Main Library circ desk
- Policies
- you need different permissions to connect to loan rules
- do not trump the loan rules
- Question Cate: What does it mean to have a consortium?
- Idea: a cross tenant-principle could solve it
- either you have the permission to change the fees/fines or not
- Mock-ups:
- charging manual fees/fines
- fee-fine owner drop down menus
- manual charges
- David: Examples fo not apply to lost book fees because it is a different process
- automated fees/fines
- overdue fines
- lost item fines
- age to lost
- etc.
- the moment the item is checked in the item would know which service-Desk & selfing locations / which fee-/fine- owner
- the belonging of the item ist more important then the association
- selections for fee/fines (e.g.: everything from one location goes to another)
- multiple service desks with multiple fee/fine owners
- special collections might have different approaches to it
- reminder fees/notices - Holly has them in mind for the next steps
- Cate on an update for the workflow engine:
- Index data is doing a survey on the workflow engine
- POs should look at features which would benefit from the workflow engine