Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Most Check-In Check-Out tests finished successfully with few failed requests per test due to data issues.

  • Tests for 8,20,30 and 75 users were performed on row, no issues defined “in between tests“. No signs of memory leaks on related modules.

  • Longevity test started to fail after 8 hours of test due to data issues so only 8 hours taken for analysis. No memory leaks or anomalies found.

  • Response times are 10-15% slower compared to Ramsons Eureka for Check-Out and the same or 10% faster for Check-in.

  • Response times are 20-30% slower compared to Ramsons Okapi .

  • Longevity test response times are the same if not better in some cases compared with Eureka and Okapi Ramsons.

Test Runs 

Test #

vUsers

Ramp-up, sec

Duration, sec 

1

8

80

2700

2

20

200

2700

3

30

300

2700

4

75

750

2700

5

30

300

36000

...

Comparison of longevity test

30 vUsers Longevity  (test #5)

Response Times, milliseconds avg.

Eureka comparison

Okapi comparison

Ramsons Eureka

Ramsons Okapi

Sunflower

Delta,ms

Delta,%

Delta,ms

Delta,%

971

1130

1080

109

+10.09%

-50

-4,6%

442

519

414

-28

-6,7%

-105

-25,3%

Service CPU utilization

most used modules:

...