Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.


Page Properties


Date

 

Sprint Report
Sprint LogERM Sprint 62
Sprint FocusContacts and file uploads


Agenda

  1. Review Retro Board (10 mins)
  2. Voting (2 mins)
  3. Discussion (15 mins)
  4. Summary Actions (3 mins)


Apologies 

Retrospective

  • Can we encourage participation of testers in the sprint review and retrospective processes - make testers feel more part of the core team and process - testers say they won't hold back from contributing tho if a burning issue crops up
  • John made first PR - thats a good milestone
  • John - Flow improving - familiarity with tech stack improving, groovy & grails improving
  • Problems - it's hard at the start when everything is new, language, environment, team, etc
  • Adi - Solid progress on bigtest
  • Peter - Access to server and config of VMs is still a problem
  • Gill - Good to see progress 
  • Kurt - Flow improving with tech stack, similar issues with transitioning to the new stack etc
  • MD - Encourage people to participate in the public chat on erm-dev for knowledge sharing and comms
  • Steve - Been away most of last sprint


Panel
borderColor#c4a246
bgColor#fcf5de

Personal highlights

  • First PR - Solid milestone
  • Good to see new functionality appearing in deployed systems
  • Familiarity with tools and techniques improving
  • Bigtest infrastructure installed - good step forwards
  • General Tooling and onboarding improving


Panel
borderColor#91c89c
bgColor#f3f9f4

What went well

  • Really great feedback from the stakeholders and project about the quality and efficiency of our work - got some explicit feedback from Kirstin.


Panel
borderColor#d04437
bgColor#fff8f7

What caused problems

  • Onboarding
  • Insufficient communication in public channels on slack
  • Devops problems impact development priorities - as we're a shared resource
  • Not enough cross knowledge sharing going on
  • Jira issue management: missed sprint closure on work that was essentially done


Discussion Notes

Not enough cross knowledge sharing going on

  • Limited time to go through everything: poll team for priority WIP demo and engineering design notes each week

Actions

  •