Date
...
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
1 min | Scribe | All | Philip Robinson is next in the list, followed by Jakub Skoczen |
2 min | Review outstanding action items | All |
|
5 min | Security Team Personnel Changes | All | Mike Gorrell is stepping down from his role on the FOLIO Security team. Jakub Skoczen has be nominated by the team to fill his spot. A formal process for this hasn't been defined yet, but we wanted to raise this here for awareness and to give folks a chance to weigh in on the choice. Two questions:
|
35 min | External Code Submissions | Ian Walls/All | Discussion ran much longer than the time originally allocated.
Jakub Skoczen created the new GitHub repo for the TC. The potential Kiwi review phases are past, so TC will focus on Lotus forward. Craig McNally posited that we're probably all on the same page about needing to agree on the standard review processes. Mark Veksler suggested that we need to be date-driven with clear timelines on when module evaluations need to completed. Brooks Travis proposed coming up with the deadline date when the subgroup meets on Friday. Marc Johnson reminded us how stressful and confusing it was to rush through a review before having finalized criteria. Mark Veksler suggested agreeing on a due date for finalization on the TC proposal process, when the subgroup meets Friday. The subgroup would propose that date and send it back to the TC for approval. Craig McNally agreed with this idea. Anton Emelianov (Deactivated) added that it should include clarity on the workflow around the submission process. Brooks Travis recommended not tying this process to actual code release processes. Craig McNally said all we're looking for is a date, which could be in Spring etc. No need to rush. |
3 min | Council Goals/Objectives | All | Follow-up from previous meetings... Previous notes: From Mike Gorrell:
Update from Tod Olson, Jeremy Huff, Craig McNally who met to discuss this last Friday.
|
5 min | Decide 1 year/2 year terms | All | Deferred last week due to insufficient TC attendees. Back in July we asked Zak Burke to create a reminder for us to discuss this...
|
5 min | Technical Decision Making Process | All | This is a carry-over from last week.
Related - in the wake of last week's slack vote:
Brainstorming on how to make technical decisions. Additional Context: 2021-10-13 Meeting notes
|
Check-out Performance | Follow-up from previous meetings... Proposal from Marc Johnson: https://wikifolio-org.folioatlassian.orgnet/wiki/display/~marcjohnson/Check+Out+Performance Marc Johnson was asked to make a proposal for checking out performance; draft document is available by the first link above. Feedback is appreciated There's a link to PTF analysis from the first mentioned doc | ||
Check-out Performance | Counter-proposal from Julian Ladisch: https://wikifolio-org.folioatlassian.orgnet/wiki/display/DD/Check+Out+Performance The Capacity Planning Team has determined that we should proceed with the caching approach. The feature UXPROD-3317 "Improve checkout performance by caching data" and 19 stories with priority P1 (linked from the UXPROD-3317 feature) have been created. | ||
Upgrade/Migration Script Performance | All | We've run into situations where migration/upgrade scripts take a very long time to complete, which is problematic. The TC should consider defining some criteria around this... Possibly a phased approach over the course of the next few releases? Overlaps with the acceptance criteria topic as it applies to modules already part of the official FOLIO release. | |
Time permitting | TC charter review | All |
Action items
- Jakub Skoczen to create a Tech Council repo and move Acceptance Requirements document
- Anton Emelianov (Deactivated) will attend the Friday subgroup meeting re: release timelines for Lotus.
- The TC will comment on Jakub's document.
...