Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

...

TimeItemWhoNotes
1 minScribeAll (Chulin)

Steffen Köhler is next in the list

2 min

Review outstanding action itemsAll

< 5 minutesExternal Code Submissions
  • Ongoing work on Acceptance Criteria and Processes (submission, evaluation, etc.)
    • Has the Acceptance Criteria v1.0 been published somewhere yet?  What about references/links in other places.
      • Will pick a Github repo and deposit it later (Jakub)
      • Tod Olson RC might be a good choice
    • Agree on short and long term goals, will continue to work on:
      • Define processes for submission, evaluation, review, feedback, acceptance
      • Improve the AC with more verifiable criteria, links to supporting documentation, etc.
      • Time frame: Ian and Jakub will take a look at Lotus dates and inform the team next week
    • LDP Review: reach out to Jeremy Huff and Nassib Nassar and sort out this by today
< 5 minutesCouncil Goals/ObjectivesAll

Follow-up from last week... 

Previous notes:

From Mike Gorrell:

I have created a clean copy of what the Community Council created to identify which FOLIO Goals/Objectives were under the purview of the CC. We also took a stab at what thought would be handled by PC or TC. Please feel free to give us feedback/etc. https://docs.google.com/document/d/17jVxW2XEK2bRSpXG9_FvdVtgqDfCTeKKM5h49IIhmRw/edit#heading=h.m2gdb67ibe1x. and use for your planning purposes.

Update from Tod OlsonJeremy HuffCraig McNally who met to discuss this last Friday.

  • The Friday meetings will be at 11am EST, please join if you can.
20 minCheck-out Performance 

Follow-up from last week... 

Proposal from Marc Johnson: https://wikifolio-org.folioatlassian.orgnet/wiki/display/~marcjohnson/Check+Out+Performance

Marc Johnson was asked to make a proposal for checking out performance; draft document is available by the first link above. Feedback is appreciated

There's a link to PTF analysis from the first mentioned doc

20 minCheck-out Performance 

Counter-proposal from Julian Ladisch: https://wikifolio-org.folioatlassian.orgnet/wiki/display/DD/Check+Out+Performance

The Capacity Planning Team has determined that we should proceed with the caching approach. The feature UXPROD-3317 "Improve checkout performance by caching data" and 19 stories with priority P1 (linked from the UXPROD-3317 feature) have been created.

Time permitting

Technical Decision Making Process

All

This is a carry-over from several weeks ago.  It was a tangent of the min.io/S3 conversation that started to delve into topics of:

  • The tech leads group not being a decision making body
  • Whether it's realistic and/or desirable for the TC to make every technical decision
    • There was some overlap here with the external code submission topic

Related - in the wake of last week's slack vote:

  • Revisit voting rules:
    • quorum: 8 (tie is no, so minimum 5 votes to pass)
    • simple majority: yes
    • of vote casted (including abstentions): yes
    • Abstain: Yes
    • Delegate: Yes
    • voting via slack: No, it has to be in person only
    • etc.
  • Let's start with voting process

NOTE: We need to frame this conversation and agree upon what we're trying to accomplish and how much time we want to dedicate to it before diving in.

Time permitting

TC charter review

All

...