...
Discovery Suppress (was originally included in the LDP but not present as of ) 11/12/20: now there for instances but not holdings.
inventory_items
- id (ID)
- chronology (Chronology)
- holdings_record_id (Holdings Record ID)
- number_of_pieces (Number Of Pieces)
- material_type_id (Material Type)
- inventory_material_types: id, name
...
- Is this the latest version of the Inventory Beta – Metadata Elements?: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RCZyXUA5rK47wZqfFPbiRM0xnw8WnMCcmlttT7B3VlI/edit#gid=952741439(ask Laura; maintained by Charlotte Whitt) Yes,
- Material type, term; Material type, category; Material type, source:Item record format codes will be locally defined. Had a list that they all whittled down? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1scRQl09jroOy-c_emITk3EQ6lkj7XPRlkupPNuL-FfM/edit#gid=1928495227 ??
- Reporting SIG master spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1svUM74Dkg4KvTXLzKZK_2k_SxeukX-87NnYf8CaTrYQ/edit#gid=312878932
- LDP-QURY project:https://issues.folio.org/browse/LDPQURY-30?jql=project%20%3D%20%22LDPQURY%22
- API Documentation: https://dev.folio.org/reference/api/
- Axel’s file:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15KTHJ7H7P7x1CEX8ycA6tz0jZg44qEddGSL1yso-nsE/edit#gid=1459821778
...
- Laura doesn’t think implemented yet.Will be a yes/no check box. (in the administrative data of the instance record) On 11/13/20 see was implemented at some point.
Data Migration - Axel
- How is the relationship between instance, holding and item meant to be?
- Will there be a best practice how to migrate your own storage into this data model? How are different kinds of units stored? (ex. a drawer full of microfilms)
- Might there be competitions between the types? holdings type vs mods of issuance; instances formats vs material type?
- How will 948 |f data be transferred?
...
- digital digitized and served locally; housed in institutional repository; when digitized; (URLS or local bib fields might have project info?)
- digitized as part of a project (e.g., HT); print that was digitized to be part of HT; previously held? Local Cornell for Google project (JL March): There is a 903 field of the BIB record that says "google" for at least a subset of these records. See for example https://newcatalog.library.cornell.edu/catalog/5089795/librarian_view
- perpetually owned vs. leased
- titles we have partial access to full-text, only through databases
- where to get specific notes: left by decedents; provenance; precious binding; copy notes; dedications; inscriptions (up to each institution to decide; on all records possible; specific notes; items record for special binding, provenance?; could also use tags – but not yet implemented in Inventory, and not sure how consistently they would be applied; it is a separate application, that shows up when enabled; each institution defines, and defines who can use; like putting a colored sticky on something; less reliable than statistical codes; holdings and instance notes likely most reliable?
- how will items that should not be counted as part of collections be coded for exclusion (e.g., equipment, personal copies on reserves, collections not owned by library but cataloged by library in catalog)?
- text searchable (nothing Laura or Peter could think of)
- item purchased at campus store