Date
...
Discussion tems
Time | Item | Who | Description | Goals |
---|---|---|---|---|
5min | Housekeeping |
| ||
20min | Request whitelist | -Review wireframe for whitelist configuration and get initial feedback Q2 2019 Requests Discussions PPT (with this topic and more): https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1hNYBxUdy3pGKKpo5BkY7bJFfBEVdEG1idCecY1xVwko/edit?usp=sharing | ||
15min | Anonymized loans | Emma Boettcher | Given fields on user record that are currently in place, how should this appear? Given proposed fields on user record (statistical code/affiliation, custom fields), to what extent are these fields helpful to show on an anonymized loan (as opposed to just in reporting) | |
20min | Notice /item history | Continuation of conversation around patron notice reports | Determine needs for patron and item notification history. |
...
Functional Area | Product Owner | Planned Release (if known) | Decision Reached | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
e.g. loans, fees/fines | Name | e.g. Q4 2018, Q1 2019 | Clearly stated decision | |
Requests | Unknown | Reviewed wireframes for configurable whitelist:
|
| |
Requests | Cate Boerema (Deactivated) | Q2 2019 | Revisited decision about which requests should display in the loan action history table:
| |
Loans | Emma Boettcher | Q2 2019 |
|
|
...