Page Comparison

...

• implementers topics list like Acq SIG?
  • Page created: Data Import Implementers Topics
  • Add topics to it
  • Development questions/discussion take priority; these would be discussion topics when there are not dev topics .If so, and if A - M creates the page, would someone volunteer to maintain it? Yay Leeda!
  • Yes: A-M create page
  Jennifer: Would be helpful to have better handling of 856s in Holdings (which
  • could also
  apply to any MARC mappings into Holdings and Item fields)
  • Be able to differentiate by indicator, so that user could specify import the resource's 856 only, or both the resource and a related one (differentiate by indicator)
    • Being able to differentiate by indicator would also allow for assigning different relationship values for different 856s; right now, the user can only pick 1 relationship value for all 856s being mapped into Holdings or Item
  • Making sure multiple 856s are not concatenated
  • Only brings in the first 856
  • Would there be a way to adjust mapping syntax to say "bring in all, bring in first only, pay attention to indicators" A-M to talk with devs - how difficult? would it still be possible to validate in UI?Examples:
  • 856$u/* = import all 856s 
  • 856$u/1 = import first 856 only
  • question: what would 856$u trigger? all 856s or first only?
  • 856[1 ]$u = import only 856 with indicators 1[blank] (and if multiple 856s with the same indicators, would this trigger all to be imported or only the first one?)
  856[1 ]$u/1 = import only the first 856 with indicators 1[blank]be addressed at the weekly Import/Export Lab

• Future topics:
  
  • Results of Feb 2022 survey 
  • See if we can make the 005 modifiable, so that the existing one can be copied into a 9xx field via a MARC modification rule so that we can keep the date of last OCLC edit to a record (Lloyd)
  • Updated import stats for Lotus

Zoom chat: 

From Taylor Smith to Everyone 01:00 PM
hello

From Jenn Colt to Everyone 01:07 PM
When the UUIDs for the holdings types got changed. Hosting had to change it back to the old UUID

From Christie Thomas (she/her) to Everyone 01:17 PM
It would be great if both work because I find it useful to not update the instance and holdings if there is not an item match, too.
thank you!

From Jenn Colt to Everyone 01:17 PM
i don't want to redo my profiles 🙂

From Christie Thomas (she/her) to Everyone 01:17 PM
me either!

From Christie Thomas (she/her) to Everyone 01:35 PM
I am pretty sure it was not retroactive.

From Raegan Wiechert to Everyone 01:52 PM
People are talking

From Jenn Colt to Everyone 01:52 PM
i think you aren’t hearing us

From Christie Thomas (she/her) to Everyone 01:52 PM
I think you cannot hear us?

From Leeda Adkins to Everyone 01:52 PM
Can you hear us AM?

From Jennifer Eustis (she/her) to Everyone 01:53 PM
We can hear you

...