Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

The following table shows the slow 75th percentile APIs taking more than 100 ms to return, and also comparing them against Goldenrod's.  Other than the 1-user test, starting with the 5-users test, all listed APIs are slower with GET automated-patron-blocks leading the way at 150% slower, while GET circulation/loans regressed up to 60%

Note: GR = Goldenrod build, HS = Honeysuckle build

API

1 user  GR (75th %tile)

1 user  HS (75th %tile)

5 users GR (75th %tile)

5 users HS (75th %tile)

8 users GR (75th %tile)8 users HS (75th %tile)

20 users GR (75th %tile)

20 users HS (75th %tile)
GET circulation/loans0.3450.3490.3650.4060.0750.1220.6540.784
GET inventory/items0.2080.1860.2080.2220.2250.2440.3120.375

POST checkin-by-barcode 

0.6820.5930.6310.6640.8150.8741.2961.467
POST checkout-by-barcode0.7500.7170.6880.7840.7330.8771.2051.469
GET automated-patron-blocks0.0690.1630.0850.1800.0790.1970.1180.296

...

This table shows that the average response time of the checkout transaction is 9% to 28% slower than in Goldenrod, and check-in in Honeysuckle likewise is about 4-22% slower (data aggregated from 5 to 20 users test runs).


Update 1/14/2011

  • Subsequent investigations (
    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem Jira
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyPERF-140
    AND
    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem Jira
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyCIRC-1014
    ) on GET /circulation/loans do not show degradations by the API itself. We hypothesize that other API calls that were executed during the test run may have dragged down the response time, particularly if it was trying to read and write to the same rows in the database at the same time. 


Longevity test

A 24-hour longevity test was performed with 20 concurrent users and running with Okapi 4.2.2. Key observations:

...