E-Resource usage data: Report management
(UXPROD-576)
|
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | UX Product |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | Q3 2020 | Parent: | E-Resource usage data: Report management |
| Type: | New Feature | Priority: | P3 |
| Reporter: | Annika Schröer | Assignee: | Annika Schröer |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | ERM, eUsage | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||
| Potential Workaround: | Annika:
Originally non-COUNTER statsitics can be prepared as a CSV file according to COUNTER formatting standard and then uploaded. This is already possible for several reports. Warning: The workaround will NOT solve the flagging/marking requirement, so the user should be fully aware of maybe inserting data into the system that does not comply to counting mechanisms defined by COUNTER. |
||||||||
| Epic Link: | E-Resource usage data: Report management | ||||||||
| Analysis Estimate: | Large < 10 days | ||||||||
| Front End Estimate: | Large < 10 days | ||||||||
| Front-End Confidence factor: | Medium | ||||||||
| Back End Estimate: | Large < 10 days | ||||||||
| Development Team: | Leipzig | ||||||||
| PO Rank: | 25 | ||||||||
| PO Ranking Note: | This is ranked lower, because it is very expensive while there is a sensible workaround. | ||||||||
| Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021): | R4 | ||||||||
| Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021): | R4 | ||||||||
| Rank: 5Colleges (ERM Jun 2020): | R4 | ||||||||
| Rank: Leipzig (Full TBD): | R1 | ||||||||
| Rank: Leipzig (ERM Aut 2019): | R2 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
Info: All rankings deleted, because of new concept. Background: Concept: Section "Statistics Upload"
In the note, the user can e.g. specify the kind of data contained by the report as well as the exact reporting period, if it differs from a full calendar year Section "Statistics"
Detail info box
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 13/Sep/18 ] |
|
Assigning to Owen as PO. |
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 13/Sep/18 ] |
|
Per Owen Stephens, I am assigning all the features for the usage data epic to Annika. |
| Comment by Khalilah Gambrell [ 11/Sep/19 ] |
|
Annika Schröer was this implemented? |
| Comment by Annika Schröer [ 12/Sep/19 ] |
|
Khalilah Gambrell No, it wasn't. There are several problems that need more discussion (e.g. flagging data as not neccessarily comparable etc.), which might lead to a decision against implementation. The workaround described above might in this case become a long term solution. It is also up to further discussion whether a simple file upload would be helpful to at least store records in the same place. |