Loans
(UXPROD-788)
|
|
| Status: | Draft |
| Project: | UX Product |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | None | Parent: | Loans |
| Type: | New Feature | Priority: | TBD |
| Reporter: | Cate Boerema (Inactive) | Assignee: | Cheryl Malmborg |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | loans, post-v1, resourceaccess, round_iv | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Epic Link: | Loans |
| Front End Estimate: | Medium < 5 days |
| Front End Estimator: | Michal Kuklis |
| Front-End Confidence factor: | Medium |
| Back End Estimate: | Large < 10 days |
| Back End Estimator: | Marc Johnson |
| Development Team: | Vega |
| Kiwi Planning Points (DO NOT CHANGE): | 4 |
| PO Rank: | 41 |
| Rank: Chalmers (Impl Aut 2019): | R5 |
| Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020): | R4 |
| Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021): | R4 |
| Rank: Duke (Full Sum 2021): | R1 |
| Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021): | R4 |
| Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020): | R4 |
| Rank: hbz (TBD): | R4 |
| Rank: Hungary (MVP End 2020): | R1 |
| Rank: Lehigh (MVP Summer 2020): | R4 |
| Rank: Leipzig (Full TBD): | R1 |
| Rank: Mainz (Full TBD): | R4 |
| Rank: MO State (MVP June 2020): | R5 |
| Rank: TAMU (MVP Jan 2021): | R2 |
| Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020): | R4 |
| Description |
|
Current situation or problem: In scope
Out of scope Use case(s) Proposed solution/stories Links to additional info Questions
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Tania Fersenheim [ 28/Jun/18 ] |
|
Changed UAL ranking to 4 at the request of patty.wanninger |
| Comment by Emma Boettcher [ 21/Sep/18 ] |
|
Possible use case (billing-related) from 6/28 email: if a loan has been declared lost & billed, it is undesirable for some (all?) institutions to issue a credit to the patron's account when it gets checked back in. In those cases, the loan is canceled. |
| Comment by Holly Mistlebauer [ 09/May/19 ] |
|
Emma Boettcher, I noticed that this has a Status of "Analysis Complete" but a Resolution of "Won't Do." Are we going to do this? (I am asking because 4 institutions marked this as needed for go-live.) |
| Comment by Emma Boettcher [ 09/May/19 ] |
|
We last discussed in March 2018 as not being needed for V1, if at all (https://folio-org.atlassian.net/wiki/display/RA/2018-03-15+Resource+Access+Meeting+Notes). Because of the go-live rankings I'll investigate further. It looks like the resolution can't be edited at least by me, so either I'll create an identical feature without the won't-do resolution, or I'll talk to an admin to edit this. |
| Comment by Holly Mistlebauer [ 09/May/19 ] |
|
I think if you close an issue and select a Resolution, when you reopen the issue the Resolution stays there. I'm a JIRA admin. Let me see if I can do anything about this. I may need to Close it and Reopen it again. |
| Comment by Holly Mistlebauer [ 09/May/19 ] |
|
Well, now it says that it is Done--that is better than Won't Do. I'll do some more digging. |
| Comment by Marc Johnson [ 20/May/19 ] |
|
Cate Boerema Emma Boettcher How would cancelling a loan affect requests for the item? |
| Comment by Marc Johnson [ 20/May/19 ] |
|
Holly Mistlebauer Have fixed incorrect the resolution (in this case, by moving the issue to draft and back to open, I think in some cases I've moved them to in progress as well to do this) |
| Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 20/May/19 ] |
|
Thanks Marc Johnson
What do you think, Emma Boettcher? It seems the most likely scenario is that item is lost. I guess we could just leave the requests as-is. Library staff would need to move them to another item in order to get them fulfilled. |
| Comment by Andrea Loigman [ 07/Jun/19 ] |
|
RA SIG discussion on 6/Jun/19 determined that the SMEs do not actually believe this to be a go-live feature. Duke, Cornell and 5Colleges all said it could wait up to a quarter or up to one year. Leipzig was not represented at the meeting. See 2019-6-6 Resource Access Meeting Notes for additional information. |