Requests
(UXPROD-790)
|
|
| Status: | In Refinement |
| Project: | UX Product |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | None | Parent: | Requests |
| Type: | New Feature | Priority: | P4 |
| Reporter: | Cate Boerema (Inactive) | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | requests, volaris-candidate | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Potential Workaround: | Cancel and re-place the request. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Epic Link: | Requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Analysis Estimate: | Medium < 5 days | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Analysis Estimator: | Tania Fersenheim | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Front End Estimate: | Medium < 5 days | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Front End Estimator: | Tania Fersenheim | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Front-End Confidence factor: | Low | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back End Estimate: | XL < 15 days | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back End Estimator: | Tania Fersenheim | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Development Team: | Vega | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kiwi Planning Points (DO NOT CHANGE): | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PO Rank: | 75 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PO Ranking Note: | 2021-02-25 - BT: Updating PO rank to more closely match calculated total rank, but bumping up a point to avoid two features with the same rank.
2020-10-04 - CB: Making my PO rank same as the calculated total rank for now. 2019-07-12: Keeping PO rank same as calculated rank (with potential minor adjustments to avoid having two features with same rank) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Chalmers (Impl Aut 2019): | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Duke (Full Sum 2021): | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021): | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: FLO (MVP Sum 2020): | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020): | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Grand Valley (Full Sum 2021): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: hbz (TBD): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Hungary (MVP End 2020): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Lehigh (MVP Summer 2020): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Leipzig (Full TBD): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Mainz (Full TBD): | R3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: MI State-Lib of MI (Sum 2021): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: MO State (MVP June 2020): | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: St. Michael's College (Sum 2021): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: TAMU (MVP Jan 2021): | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Purpose: Implement the ability to reset an open request to "Open - not yet filled" request status, including:
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Tania Fersenheim [ 12/Jun/18 ] |
|
Matt Connolly and Marc Johnson - let's talk about how to estimate front end and back end |
| Comment by Tania Fersenheim [ 27/Jun/18 ] |
|
Matt Connolly & Marc Johnson - I applied back and front end estimates to this - could you each do a sanity check on the estimates and let me know if you want to talk over the issue |
| Comment by Marc Johnson [ 29/Jun/18 ] |
|
Tania Fersenheim Looks ok to me. I'm curious, under what circumstances would we want to do this, because it has got stuck in the request fulfilment process somehow? |
| Comment by Tania Fersenheim [ 29/Jun/18 ] |
|
Marc Johnson - Sort of. Either the item goes AWOL (not super common but not unheard of) or a decision is made that an item needs to have something else done with it. E.g. checking it out to a different person, routed temporarily to repair, etc, but the original request still needs to be filled and still needs to retain its position in the queue. |
| Comment by Anya [ 29/Mar/19 ] |
|
Comment from March meeting : if it is just a status wording issues - it is not needed |
| Comment by Marie Widigson [ 22/Feb/21 ] |
|
Changing our ranking to R2 for this feature since it's needed for
|
| Comment by Brooks Travis [ 25/Feb/21 ] |
|
Marc Johnson Holly Mistlebauer I've updated this ticket to remove the requirement for an action-based permission, per conversations with the RA SIG on 2021-02-22. I'm going to remove
|
| Comment by Holly Mistlebauer [ 07/Mar/22 ] |
|
This feature is marked DRAFT until Brooks Travis has a chance to review it for validity. |
| Comment by Brooks Travis [ 07/Mar/22 ] |
|
Stephanie Buck julie.bickle Might be worth reviewing this with Vega Devs, or at least having them take a look at it so they can ask questions. It's not super high-priority. Including you, Julie, because of the notice trigger story. |
| Comment by Stephanie Buck [ 09/Mar/22 ] |
|
Brooks Travis, julie.bickle will be joining Vega's Friday refinement sessions. They are every other week at 10am ET. If you'd like to coordinate with Julie when to review with Vega, just let me know what date works for you. |