Consortia (Cross Tenant) (UXPROD-794)

[UXPROD-806] Acquistion shall be possible in a shared environment (one central dept. for all) or decentralized (each library for itself) Created: 05/Jun/18  Updated: 04/Nov/22

Status: Open
Project: UX Product
Components: None
Affects versions: None
Fix versions: None
Parent: Consortia (Cross Tenant)

Type: New Feature Priority: P1
Reporter: Cate Boerema (Inactive) Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: suppress-from-capplan
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original estimate: Not Specified

Epic Link: Consortia (Cross Tenant)
Rank: Chalmers (Impl Aut 2019): R5
Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020): R5
Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021): R5
Rank: Duke (Full Sum 2021): R4
Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021): R5
Rank: FLO (MVP Sum 2020): R5
Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020): R4
Rank: hbz (TBD): R4
Rank: Hungary (MVP End 2020): R1
Rank: Lehigh (MVP Summer 2020): R4
Rank: TAMU (MVP Jan 2021): R5
Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020): R5

 Description   

Description:
Acquistion shall be possible in a shared environment (one central dept. for all) or decentralized (each library for itself)

Notes:
Possibly two models depending on which model the consortium chooses to implement? Decentralization is more important to most consortia than centralized. Decentralization = Critical. Centralization = Low



 Comments   
Comment by Kelly Drake [ 12/Jun/19 ]

Needs clarification?
Is this a choice that implementing libraries need to make? or?

Comment by Kelly Drake [ 12/Jun/19 ]

Or does this also relate more to Single tenant?

Generated at Fri Feb 09 00:10:33 UTC 2024 using Jira 1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100246-sha1:7a5c50119eb0633d306e14180817ddef5e80c75d.