Loans
(UXPROD-788)
|
|
| Status: | Draft |
| Project: | UX Product |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | None | Parent: | Loans |
| Type: | New Feature | Priority: | TBD |
| Reporter: | Emma Boettcher | Assignee: | Cheryl Malmborg |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | check-in, loans, resourceaccess, round_iv | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Epic Link: | Loans | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Front End Estimate: | Small < 3 days | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Front End Estimator: | Aditya matukumalli | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Front-End Confidence factor: | Medium | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Back End Estimate: | Very Small (VS) < 1day | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Back End Estimator: | Marc Johnson | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimation Notes and Assumptions: | Excludes work to split the status
Excludes workflow states (as FOLIO hasn't had them yet) Properties are already available in APIs used in Check In UI |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Development Team: | Vega | ||||||||||||||||||||
| PO Rank: | 98 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| PO Ranking Note: | CM: Increased rank based on R1 and R2 rankings and size estimates. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Chalmers (Impl Aut 2019): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Duke (Full Sum 2021): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021): | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: FLO (MVP Sum 2020): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020): | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: hbz (TBD): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Hungary (MVP End 2020): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Lehigh (MVP Summer 2020): | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Leipzig (Full TBD): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: MO State (MVP June 2020): | R3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: TAMU (MVP Jan 2021): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020): | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Three separate pieces of information (item status, existence of requests, and workflow) were previously grouped in one field (status), and may now need to be represented differently on the check-in screen. Backdating check in: how to display when backdated by several days, and how to clear a backdated time without clearing the session history.
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Emma Boettcher [ 07/Nov/18 ] |
|
May be duplicate with
|
| Comment by Erin Nettifee [ 11/May/20 ] |
|
Emma Boettcher is this being worked on now in Q2? It looks like the only associated feature (
This is in the round IV implementers list, which is why I'm looking at it. |
| Comment by Holly Mistlebauer [ 17/Jun/20 ] |
|
Chicago comment from Round IV Outliers spreadsheet: This could be split into two with different priorities. The go-live part is to accommodate the 3-part item state. (but not show-stopper)The backdate loan functionality we definitely want, but could wait a little bit. -Tod Olson |