Migration Tools
(UXPROD-850)
|
|
| Status: | Open |
| Project: | UX Product |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | None | Parent: | Migration Tools |
| Type: | New Feature | Priority: | P3 |
| Reporter: | Cate Boerema (Inactive) | Assignee: | Ian Walls |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | historical_charges, library_dependent, migration-load, po-mvp, resourceaccess | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Potential Workaround: | A flat file could be dumped with this information at go-live and stored securely, if records need to be kept but not necessarily in a patron-accessible fashion - Ian W. |
| Epic Link: | Migration Tools |
| Front End Estimate: | Large < 10 days |
| Front End Estimator: | Jakub Skoczen |
| Back End Estimate: | Large < 10 days |
| Back End Estimator: | Jakub Skoczen |
| Development Team: | None |
| Kiwi Planning Points (DO NOT CHANGE): | 1 |
| PO Rank: | 50 |
| PO Ranking Note: | Requires biblio/holdings information to be migrated first ( |
| Rank: Chalmers (Impl Aut 2019): | R5 |
| Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020): | R5 |
| Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021): | R5 |
| Rank: Duke (Full Sum 2021): | R5 |
| Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021): | R5 |
| Rank: FLO (MVP Sum 2020): | R1 |
| Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020): | R2 |
| Rank: hbz (TBD): | R2 |
| Rank: Hungary (MVP End 2020): | R1 |
| Rank: Lehigh (MVP Summer 2020): | R2 |
| Rank: TAMU (MVP Jan 2021): | R5 |
| Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020): | R5 |
| Description |
|
Depends on the pre-existing ILS and 1st libraries moving over |
| Comments |
| Comment by patty.wanninger [ 27/Dec/18 ] |
|
assigned to me as PO, added migration-load tag |
| Comment by Anya [ 29/Mar/19 ] |
|
Comment from March Meeting: Is this just a count field(s) in the item record? Can it just go into reporting instead of the FOLIO item record? |
| Comment by Ian Walls [ 29/Jul/19 ] |
|
I presume this is full data of previous checkouts (patron, checkout date, due date, return date, etc), rather than just a count of number of time circulated. While some libraries will want to purge this information regularly and only migrate the counts for statistical purposes, others may prefer to keep the data (either in full or anonymized). |
| Comment by Ian Walls [ 30/Jul/19 ] |
|
Apologies; misunderstood the order of PO ranks. Re-ranking |
| Comment by Charlotte Whitt [ 09/Oct/19 ] |
|
Hi Ian Walls - is Q3 2020 correct? CC: Kelly Drake |