LC Tenants Structure Development - ECS
(UXPROD-4561)
|
|
| Status: | Open |
| Project: | UX Product |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | Ramsons (R2 2024) | Parent: | LC Tenants Structure Development - ECS |
| Type: | New Feature | Priority: | P2 |
| Reporter: | Khalilah Gambrell | Assignee: | Irina Pokhylets |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | LC-priority2, loc | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Epic Link: | LC Tenants Structure Development - ECS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Front End Estimate: | XL < 15 days | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Front End Estimator: | Khalilah Gambrell | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Front-End Confidence factor: | 20% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back End Estimate: | XXL < 30 days | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back End Estimator: | Khalilah Gambrell | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back-End Confidence factor: | 20% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Development Team: | Volaris | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PO Rank: | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Any work needed to support LC Tenant Structure support > Users workflows
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Tim Auger [ 18/Jan/24 ] |
|
Dennis Bridges Khalilah Gambrell It's not clear to me the use case for propagating profile pics. Regardless, can we move this to Sunflower with the idea that until the use cases are clarified, we cannot be sure of the delivery timeframe? Or, do we think we will have clarity on this within the next week or so? |
| Comment by Khalilah Gambrell [ 18/Jan/24 ] |
|
Hey Tim Auger - can we keep this feature in Ramsons and schedule a discussion in the next two weeks to discuss use cases? |
| Comment by Tim Auger [ 18/Jan/24 ] |
|
Cool. thanks, Khalilah Gambrell I will setup a meeting a couple of weeks from today. |
| Comment by Dennis Bridges [ 18/Jan/24 ] |
|
I'm not familiar with use cases for profile picture but I would imagine this will be dependent on decision made regarding circulation functionality. Currently we are not planning to use the shadow accounts to facilitate circulation. Ie. It is not possible to give a loan to a shadow user. Loans are only created against primary accounts. Also, Ideally we minimize the amount of “Duplicated” data in shadow records so it seems logical to avoid copying over the profile pics. Also potentially just not displaying any profile pic options for a user with type = shadow. (Eg. don't allow someone to upload a profile picture to a shadow account) I could see that being one of the only stories needed here. |
| Comment by Irina Pokhylets [ 30/Jan/24 ] |
|
Hi, CC: Amelia Sutton |
| Comment by Dennis Bridges [ 30/Jan/24 ] |
|
I would defer to Amelia Sutton on this but I believe it would make sense NOT to show the thumbnail for shadow accounts as it is not possible to have a photo for this type of account at present. |
| Comment by Amelia Sutton [ 31/Jan/24 ] |
|
Irina Pokhylets I agree with Dennis, it isn't necessary to display the thumbnail on shadow accounts. |
| Comment by Irina Pokhylets [ 01/Feb/24 ] |
|
Amelia Sutton, Dennis Bridges Thank you! |