LC Tenants Structure Development - ECS (UXPROD-4561)

[UXPROD-4562] LC Tenants Structure support > Users (Volaris) Created: 20/Nov/23  Updated: 08/Feb/24

Status: Open
Project: UX Product
Components: None
Affects versions: None
Fix versions: Ramsons (R2 2024)
Parent: LC Tenants Structure Development - ECS

Type: New Feature Priority: P2
Reporter: Khalilah Gambrell Assignee: Irina Pokhylets
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: LC-priority2, loc
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original estimate: Not Specified

Attachments: PNG File image-2024-01-30-16-54-59-397.png    
Issue links:
Defines
defines MODUSERS-427 Disabling profile pic functionality f... Open
defines UIU-3045 Don't allow to upload a profile pictu... Open
defines MODUSERS-424 [Spike] Don't allow to upload a profi... Closed
Relates
relates to UXPROD-4561 LC Tenants Structure Development - ECS Open
relates to UXPROD-4570 Merge duplicate instances (ECS and no... Draft
Epic Link: LC Tenants Structure Development - ECS
Front End Estimate: XL < 15 days
Front End Estimator: Khalilah Gambrell
Front-End Confidence factor: 20%
Back End Estimate: XXL < 30 days
Back End Estimator: Khalilah Gambrell
Back-End Confidence factor: 20%
Development Team: Volaris
PO Rank: 0

 Description   

Any work needed to support LC Tenant Structure support > Users workflows 

  • Don't allow to upload a profile picture to a shadow account.


 Comments   
Comment by Tim Auger [ 18/Jan/24 ]

Dennis Bridges Khalilah Gambrell It's not clear to me the use case for propagating profile pics. Regardless, can we move this to Sunflower with the idea that until the use cases are clarified, we cannot be sure of the delivery timeframe? Or, do we think we will have clarity on this within the next week or so?

Comment by Khalilah Gambrell [ 18/Jan/24 ]

Hey Tim Auger  - can we keep this feature in Ramsons and schedule a discussion in the next two weeks to discuss use cases?

Comment by Tim Auger [ 18/Jan/24 ]

Cool. thanks, Khalilah Gambrell I will setup a meeting a couple of weeks from today.

Comment by Dennis Bridges [ 18/Jan/24 ]

I'm not familiar with use cases for profile picture but I would imagine this will be dependent on decision made regarding circulation functionality. 

Currently we are not planning to use the shadow accounts to facilitate circulation. Ie. It is not possible to give a loan to a shadow user. Loans are only created against primary accounts.

Also, Ideally we minimize the amount of “Duplicated” data in shadow records so it seems logical to avoid copying over the profile pics. Also potentially just not displaying any profile pic options for a user with type = shadow. (Eg. don't allow someone to upload a profile picture to a shadow account) I could see that being one of the only stories needed here.

Comment by Irina Pokhylets [ 30/Jan/24 ]

Hi,
Dennis Bridges I have a question about displaying a shadow user profile when the profile pictures are available for a tenant.
Should the shadow user profile be displayed without rendering (as for tenants where the profile pictures feature is disabled) or do we need to show a profile picture/thumbnail without the ability to upload a photo like on the mockup below?

CC: Amelia Sutton 

Comment by Dennis Bridges [ 30/Jan/24 ]

I would defer to Amelia Sutton on this but I believe it would make sense NOT to show the thumbnail for shadow accounts as it is not possible to have a photo for this type of account at present.

Comment by Amelia Sutton [ 31/Jan/24 ]

Irina Pokhylets I agree with Dennis, it isn't necessary to display the thumbnail on shadow accounts.

Comment by Irina Pokhylets [ 01/Feb/24 ]

Amelia Sutton, Dennis Bridges Thank you!

Generated at Fri Feb 09 00:40:52 UTC 2024 using Jira 1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100246-sha1:7a5c50119eb0633d306e14180817ddef5e80c75d.