LOC - CDS support
(UXPROD-4428)
|
|
| Status: | In Progress |
| Project: | UX Product |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | Quesnelia (R1 2024) | Parent: | LOC - CDS support |
| Type: | New Feature | Priority: | P2 |
| Reporter: | Khalilah Gambrell | Assignee: | Ryan Taylor |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | LC-priority2, epam-folijet, inventory, loc | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Release: | Quesnelia (R1 2024) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Epic Link: | LOC - CDS support | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Front End Estimate: | Medium < 5 days | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Front End Estimator: | Mariia Aloshyna | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Front-End Confidence factor: | 70% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back End Estimate: | Medium < 5 days | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back End Estimator: | Kateryna Senchenko | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back-End Confidence factor: | 90% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Development Team: | Folijet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PO Rank: | 122 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Summary
Feature includes:
Feature does not include:
Dependencies:
Developer notes
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Ann-Marie Breaux (Inactive) [ 15/May/23 ] |
|
Hi Khalilah Gambrell should this be a story or a feature? If a story, should it be in UXPROD or an Inventory module? |
| Comment by Charlotte Whitt [ 03/Oct/23 ] |
|
Hi Felix Hemme and Antje Niemann - I added you as watchers of this new feature re. marking/setting instance for deletion |
| Comment by Ann-Marie Breaux (Inactive) [ 10/Oct/23 ] |
|
Hi Charlotte Whitt This is a first attempt/thin thread to make it so that the staff suppress facet works better, and so that MARC Bibs are marked for deletion when an Instance is marked for deletion. It's needed by Library of Congress, and we're hoping will give us a beginning to being able to delete instances in the future. |
| Comment by Charlotte Whitt [ 29/Nov/23 ] |
|
Hi Ryan Taylor I just noticed that you deleted a comment in following bullet point in the description:
I don't know who originally did add that comment in parentheses, but the key thing is, that suppressed records should not be displayed in the default display in the result list, unless you are a staff user, who has the permission to view suppressed records.
|
| Comment by Ann-Marie Breaux (Inactive) [ 29/Nov/23 ] |
|
Hi Charlotte Whitt That bullet point needs to be read in the context of the one above it - in the future, staff suppressed instances will no longer appear in regular search results, and the only users who will be able to make them appear in search results will be users who have access to that filter - which is controlled by the revised permission.
See
|
| Comment by Lynne Fors [ 30/Nov/23 ] |
|
Marked for delete/Staff Suppressed Instances shouldn't show up any of the Acquisitions functionality or any other Apps that touch Inventory. |
| Comment by Khalilah Gambrell [ 01/Dec/23 ] |
|
Hey Ryan Taylor - we should confirm that the Find an instance plug-in defaults to not show staff suppressed instances. |
| Comment by Ryan Taylor [ 01/Dec/23 ] |
|
Khalilah Gambrell - Yep! Questions around plug-in coverage came up in one of the stories refinement. I anticipate an additional story to cover this aspect. |
| Comment by Jennifer Eustis [ 20/Dec/23 ] |
|
Ryan Taylor We were just talking about this functionality here in the 5C. One of things we do now is add a statistical code to instances that says Record marked for deletion. One reason we do this is because we can filter on statistical code. For a future feature, would it be possible to consider having the ability to filter records by those marked for deletion and those not marked just like how we have for suppressed from discovery and staff suppress? I know we talked about the icon for mark for deletion. How will the instance preview look like once it is marked for deletion? It would be great to have some visual cue that the record is marked deleted. In the item, the record has that status up top next to the item identifier. |
| Comment by Charlotte Whitt [ 20/Dec/23 ] |
|
Hi Jenifer Sanchez Salazar and Ryan Taylor - there is already this story for filtering on instances which are marked as deleted: |
| Comment by Jennifer Eustis [ 05/Jan/24 ] |
|
Charlotte Whitt Thank you for pointing this out. This is fantastic! I'll share with the folks here at the 5C. |