Features that will be implemented to enhance FOLIO's ability to support consortia (Phase 2)
(UXPROD-4485)
|
|
| Status: | Draft |
| Project: | UX Product |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | None | Parent: | Features that will be implemented to enhance FOLIO's ability to support consortia (Phase 2) |
| Type: | New Feature | Priority: | P4 |
| Reporter: | Joseph Reimers | Assignee: | Joseph Reimers |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | ecs | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||
| Epic Link: | Features that will be implemented to enhance FOLIO's ability to support consortia (Phase 2) | ||||||||
| Front End Estimate: | XL < 15 days | ||||||||
| Front End Estimator: | Khalilah Gambrell | ||||||||
| Front-End Confidence factor: | 20% | ||||||||
| Back End Estimate: | XXL < 30 days | ||||||||
| Back End Estimator: | Khalilah Gambrell | ||||||||
| Back-End Confidence factor: | 20% | ||||||||
| Development Team: | Thunderjet | ||||||||
| PO Rank: | 0 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
Current situation or problem: The central office of a consortium may want to maintain an "official" list of certain types of records - Organizations in particular - for members to access and use and attach their own member-specific information in appropriate accordions. The main information (e.g. name, code) is only editable centrally. Other information (e.g. contact persons, account info, integrations) should be customizable at the member level. In scope
Out of scope Use case(s) Organizations generally have data that is unique to them and not unique to their relationship with a specific library. Eg. Names, addresses, URLs, accepted currencies etc. Proposed solution/stories Links to additional info Questions |
| Comments |
| Comment by Dennis Bridges [ 21/Dec/23 ] |
|
Joseph Reimers I just noticed the LC tag on this but I have removed it as it will not apply in their system (All orgs will be central). Need to figure out what release this should be associated with as it will be important to consortium moving forward. |
| Comment by Joseph Reimers [ 21/Dec/23 ] |
|
Dennis Bridges I had put the LC tag on this before we had finalized the centralized ordering model (so data tenants have no need for this.) Having said that, this was identified as a desirable feature by MOBIUS, so it's something we want to keep on the relatively near-term roadmap. |