Fees/Fines (UXPROD-792)

[UXPROD-3971] Fee/Fine permissions - Create view-only permission to Settings > Users > Patron blocks Created: 01/Sep/20  Updated: 29/Jun/23  Resolved: 29/Jun/23

Status: Closed
Project: UX Product
Components: None
Affects versions: None
Fix versions: None
Parent: Fees/Fines

Type: New Feature Priority: P2
Reporter: Holly Mistlebauer Assignee: Erin Nettifee
Resolution: Won't Do Votes: 0
Labels: UNAM, feesfines, ff-permissions, ui-only
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original estimate: Not Specified

Attachments: PNG File screenshot-1.png    
Issue links:
Defines
is defined by UIU-2771 Create view only permission to Settin... Open
Relates
relates to UXPROD-3975 Fee/Fine permissions - Create view-on... In Refinement
Epic Link: Fees/Fines
Development Team: Vega
Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021): R2

 Description   

Overview: The settings located with Settings>Users>Patron blocks are currently controlled by three permissions:

Settings (Users): Can create, edit and remove patron blocks limits
Settings (Users): Can create, edit and remove patron blocks templates
Settings (Users): Can view and edit patron blocks conditions

Now we need to add view permissions for this area of settings.

Actions:

  • Create one permission: "Settings (Users): Can view patron blocks conditions, limits and templates" that provides view-only access to those areas of Settings.


 Comments   
Comment by Erin Nettifee [ 18/Jan/23 ]

As of Jan 2023, I can see

  • Settings (Users): Can create, edit and remove patron blocks limits
  • Settings (Users): Can create, edit and remove patron blocks templates
  • Settings (Users): Can view and edit patron blocks conditions

It seems like we probably need to also include a view for templates.

But, are there scenarios where you would only grant a view to limits, and not a view to templates to conditions? I think that's unlikely. I have asked in the RA slack channel, but am proceeding with this story assuming that only one permission is needed.

Comment by Erin Nettifee [ 29/Jun/23 ]

This is being addressed as part of UXPROD-4344 Closed now, so I am going to close this as a duplicate.

Comment by Erin Nettifee [ 29/Jun/23 ]

Being addressed as part of UXPROD-4344 Closed due to some crossed-wires with creating view-only permissions.

Generated at Fri Feb 09 00:36:15 UTC 2024 using Jira 1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100246-sha1:7a5c50119eb0633d306e14180817ddef5e80c75d.