[UXPROD-3169] In Circulation settings, do not allow deletion of loan policies that have already been used in open, closed and/or anonymized loans Created: 08/Jul/21 Updated: 13/Oct/22 |
|
| Status: | Open |
| Project: | UX Product |
| Components: | None |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | None |
| Type: | New Feature | Priority: | TBD |
| Reporter: | Erin Nettifee | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 1 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||
| Development Team: | None | ||||||||
| PO Rank: | 0 | ||||||||
| Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021): | R2 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
Current situation or problem: As adopters are testing and beginning to implement FOLIO, they are finding that they may create loan policies that are used for loans but then should no longer be used. While those policies that are no longer in use can be indicated as such by naming, changing a loan policy name can break a circulation rule, and could potentially lead to a messy loan policy list. Libraries can currently delete loan policies, but there is no check to see if that loan policy has been used in a loan. So if you delete a loan policy while the item is checked out, and the item is then returned, parts of the circulation workflow can break. So ideally, we'd have functionality that looks like this, once a library decides a policy should no longer be used.
The circulation rules editor does tell you if a policy no longer exists, but ideally we would prompt the FOLIO user to edit the circulation rules to remove the policy they want to delete, before deletion occurs. ]In scope Out of scope Use case(s) Proposed solution/stories Links to additional info Questions
|