Course Reserves (UXPROD-791)

[UXPROD-2776] Support for Separate Reserve Teams or Libraries within a Single Tenant Created: 22/Oct/20  Updated: 16/Feb/22

Status: Open
Project: UX Product
Components: None
Affects versions: None
Fix versions: None
Parent: Course Reserves

Type: New Feature Priority: TBD
Reporter: Kelly Drake Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 2
Labels: courses
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original estimate: Not Specified

Potential Workaround: All Courses could contain
Epic Link: Course Reserves
Development Team: None
Kiwi Planning Points (DO NOT CHANGE): 41
Rank: Chalmers (Impl Aut 2019): R5
Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020): R5
Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021): R4
Rank: Duke (Full Sum 2021): R1
Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021): R1
Rank: FLO (MVP Sum 2020): R4
Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020): R3
Rank: Grand Valley (Full Sum 2021): R4
Rank: MO State (MVP June 2020): R4
Rank: TAMU (MVP Jan 2021): R1
Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020): R1
Rank: Warner (MVP Jul 2020): R4

 Description   

Current situation or problem:
In a tenant with multiple libraries (either that of a consortia, or a large multi-library institution) all Courses and co-mingled. The Course Reserves app does not allow for associating a course with any particular library.

Users would like to be able to separate out Courses and Reserves associated with the individual libraries.

Also need to be able to filter courses for Discovery harvesting and display

Use case(s)

Proposed solution/stories
Could work similar to acquisition units.
Could be based on Tenant settings.
Links to additional info

Questions
Does this feature include both the ability to search and sort, as well as permissions?



 Comments   
Comment by Anya [ 15/Feb/22 ]

Charlotte Whitt Khalilah Gambrell do we know when this is targeted for?

Comment by Erin Nettifee [ 16/Feb/22 ]

Hi Anya. The Reserves group last discussed this quite a long time ago (prior to Charlotte becoming the temp PO) and it was low priority at that point. I don't see this being slotted for development any time soon, especially since Reserves doesn't have a convener, unless a dedicated PO / dev team comes along for it.

Is there context here that suggests this should be a higher priority?

Comment by Anya [ 16/Feb/22 ]

Erin Nettifee the Five colleges needs this and so will any multi-campus/institution site on the same folio tenant. 

 

cc: Aaron Neslin

Comment by Erin Nettifee [ 16/Feb/22 ]

Anya Aaron Neslin

There were 5 College reps part of the initial discussion so they were part of the initial prioritization, though I recognize at that point there may not have yet been a clear understanding of what features are needed. I know that I had discussion with them about LTI as well - that module can support differentiation between campus environments for the purpose of connecting out to LMS systems as long as the course identifiers were set appropriately. We never advanced the discussion to the point of talking about specific desired functionality.

Generated at Fri Feb 09 00:26:44 UTC 2024 using Jira 1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100246-sha1:7a5c50119eb0633d306e14180817ddef5e80c75d.