Fees/Fines
(UXPROD-792)
|
|
| Status: | Draft |
| Project: | UX Product |
| Components: | Fees/Fines |
| Affects versions: | None |
| Fix versions: | None | Parent: | Fees/Fines |
| Type: | New Feature | Priority: | TBD |
| Reporter: | Emma Boettcher | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | Unassigned-from-Holly, delete_record_functionality, feesfines, resourceaccess | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue links: |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Epic Link: | Fees/Fines | ||||||||||||||||
| Development Team: | Vega | ||||||||||||||||
| Kiwi Planning Points (DO NOT CHANGE): | 10 | ||||||||||||||||
| PO Rank: | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Chalmers (Impl Aut 2019): | R1 | ||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Duke (Full Sum 2021): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||
| Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||
| Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020): | R5 | ||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Grand Valley (Full Sum 2021): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||
| Rank: Mainz (Full TBD): | R3 | ||||||||||||||||
| Rank: MO State (MVP June 2020): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||
| Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020): | R4 | ||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Update on September 3, 2020 Holly presented this topic to the RA SIG on September 3, 2020. See her slide deck at https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1gCwAlZ-UTUHj_65EshjHRKcIu0oFLIDPijqvJzS1nXw/edit?usp=sharing (with decisions documented in blue text). We need to "scrub" fee/fine data in two ways:
After a certain period of time has passed, an institution may want to delete fees/fines that have been closed for a certain interval. For tax purposes a US library may need to keep the transactions for 7-10 years, but a library in another country might not want to keep the fees/fines around that long. After the fee/fine record has been anonymized (identifying loan data removed), the institution may elect to keep the fee/fine records as an indicator of how many overdue fines or lost item fines that patron has incurred, or how often they have had fees/fines waived, cancelled, refunded, etc. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Marie Widigson [ 18/Feb/21 ] |
|
Although Chalmers is not using fees/fines we're changing our handling of overdue books now and will be using the status Aged to lost, and a fake fee. As anonymizing all closed loans and fees is a legal demand (GDPR) we change our ranking to R2. |