Users App (UXPROD-784)

[UXPROD-261] Users App: Additional Identifier Fields Created: 22/Feb/18  Updated: 16/Sep/20  Resolved: 29/Jul/19

Status: Closed
Project: UX Product
Components: None
Affects versions: None
Fix versions: None
Parent: Users App

Type: New Feature Priority: P3
Reporter: Cate Boerema (Inactive) Assignee: patty.wanninger
Resolution: Duplicate Votes: 0
Labels: post-v1, usermanagement
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original estimate: Not Specified

Issue links:
Duplicate
duplicates UXPROD-1295 Users App: Add phone number type and ... Closed
duplicates UXPROD-2147 Users App: Department Field Closed
duplicates UXPROD-2148 Users App: Support multiple External ... Analysis Complete
Epic Link: Users App
Analysis Estimator: Khalilah Gambrell
Front End Estimate: Small < 3 days
Front End Estimator: Jakub Skoczen
Back End Estimate: XXL < 30 days
Back End Estimator: Jakub Skoczen
Development Team: Prokopovych
Rank: Chalmers (Impl Aut 2019): R5
Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020): R5
Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021): R5
Rank: Duke (Full Sum 2021): R1
Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021): R4
Rank: FLO (MVP Sum 2020): R4
Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020): R4
Rank: hbz (TBD): R4
Rank: Hungary (MVP End 2020): R1
Rank: Lehigh (MVP Summer 2020): R5
Rank: Leipzig (Full TBD): R1
Rank: TAMU (MVP Jan 2021): R4
Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020): R4

 Description   
  • Additional identifier fields needed? This was proposed by Andrea Loigman, as it is required by Duke.
  • Assume it is treated like other IDs in that you can search, use for scanning, use for SSO etc


 Comments   
Comment by Khalilah Gambrell [ 10/Apr/18 ]

Per UM SIG meeting 3/13 - additional identifiers was discussed and the group decided that they were not needed at this time.

Comment by Khalilah Gambrell [ 11/Jul/18 ]

Confirmed with Lehigh that this feature is not needed.

Comment by patty.wanninger [ 29/Jul/19 ]

This is covered in UXPROD-1295 Closed .

Comment by Erin Nettifee [ 30/Jul/19 ]

Hi Patty - we really want to make sure UXPROD-1295 Closed specifically addresses the need for identifier fields which is why this had been thought of as separate. I'm fine with consolidating but I want to make sure that need is not lost. Currently, it's capped at 3 IDs and Duke needs to ideally not have a cap, or if a cap is required technically, have it be much larger.

Generated at Fri Feb 09 00:06:53 UTC 2024 using Jira 1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100246-sha1:7a5c50119eb0633d306e14180817ddef5e80c75d.