Users App (UXPROD-784)

[UXPROD-259] Add new features to import Created: 22/Feb/18  Updated: 17/Sep/20  Resolved: 17/Sep/20

Status: Closed
Project: UX Product
Components: None
Affects versions: None
Fix versions: None
Parent: Users App

Type: New Feature Priority: P3
Reporter: Cate Boerema (Inactive) Assignee: patty.wanninger
Resolution: Won't Do Votes: 0
Labels: migration-load, round_iv, usermanagement
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original estimate: Not Specified

Issue links:
Relates
relates to UXPROD-31 Import data: Batch Import of user rec... Closed
relates to UXPROD-850 Migration Tools Open
Epic Link: Users App
Analysis Estimate: Small < 3 days
Analysis Estimator: István Bender
Front End Estimator: Jakub Skoczen
Back End Estimate: Large < 10 days
Back End Estimator: Katalin Lovagné Szűcs
Development Team: Prokopovych
PO Rank: 65
Rank: Chalmers (Impl Aut 2019): R4
Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020): R4
Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021): R2
Rank: Duke (Full Sum 2021): R1
Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021): R4
Rank: FLO (MVP Sum 2020): R1
Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020): R4
Rank: hbz (TBD): R4
Rank: Hungary (MVP End 2020): R1
Rank: Lehigh (MVP Summer 2020): R4
Rank: TAMU (MVP Jan 2021): R2
Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020): R2

 Description   

Update import as needed to support new fields and features

See, for example, UXPROD-4 Closed , UXPROD-34 Closed , UXPROD-36 In Progress etc.



 Comments   
Comment by Erin Nettifee [ 18/Sep/19 ]

Cate Boerema - we discussed this in today's UM SIG. Can this be closed? We don't think this is the way that import is actually happening.

patty.wanninger

Comment by Cate Boerema (Inactive) [ 19/Sep/19 ]

We don't think this is the way that import is actually happening.

Erin Nettifee could you please elaborate on this? My understanding is that, for every new field added to the Users UI, there is corresponding work that needs to be done on the user import to make it possible to actually import the data. Is that not your understanding?

Comment by Erin Nettifee [ 19/Sep/19 ]

Sure. That matches our understanding. But in practice the work to add to the import is done as part of that feature and attached as a requirement to that feature for the field being added. So it seemed to us that this was more of an umbrella catch all that wasn’t actually capturing the work, so it could be closed.

If we’re not understanding I think it’s fine to stay open too. We were just reviewing these as part of discussing responses to what didn’t make the CAPMVP plan.

Comment by Khalilah Gambrell [ 17/Sep/20 ]

patty.wanninger and Cate Boerema, should this feature be closed?

Comment by patty.wanninger [ 17/Sep/20 ]

We have other tickets that describe specific functionality.

Generated at Fri Feb 09 00:06:52 UTC 2024 using Jira 1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100246-sha1:7a5c50119eb0633d306e14180817ddef5e80c75d.